Table 2.
Association of Factor Scores with Continuous eGFR Change†
Unadjusted β (95% CI) | Model 1* β (95% CI) | Model 2** β (95% CI) | |
---|---|---|---|
Tubule Injury/Repair (NGAL, IL-18, and YKL-40) | −0.44 (−0.59, −0.28) | −0.38 (−0.56, −0.21) | −0.06 (−0.24, 0.12) |
Tubule Injury/Fibrosis (KIM-1 and MCP-1) | −0.41 (−0.57, −0.25) | −0.34 (−0.50, −0.18) | −0.16 (−0.33, 0.01) |
Tubule Reabsorption (α1m, β2m) | −0.90 (−1.06, −0.74) | −0.71 (−0.87, −0.54) | −0.07 (−0.25, 0.12) |
Tubule Reserve/Mineral Metabolism (UMOD, iPTH, iFGF23) |
−0.94 (−1.09, −0.78) | −0.96 (−1.13, −0.80) | −0.58 (−0.76, −0.39) |
Albumin-creatinine ratio | −1.74 (−1.89, −1.58) | −1.58 (−1.74, −1.42) | −1.53 (−1.69, −1.36) |
Percentage changein eGFRper year
model 1: age, sex, race, randomization arm, SBP, DBP, number of antihypertensive meds, ACEi or ARB use, diuretic use, history of CVD or HF, current smoker, BMI, LDL, total cholesterol.
model 2: model 1 + baseline eGFR and UACR
Each factor is modeled per SD higher. ACR was log transformed and represents a SD higher on the log scale, to provide a reference for comparison of strengths of association.