Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 13;11:100118. doi: 10.1016/j.metop.2021.100118

Table 5.

Effect of the aqueous leaf extract of Rubus erlangeri on weekly body weight change of diabetic mice.


Groups
Body Weight in g
Initial 1st Week 2nd Week 3rd Week
NOC 30.00 ± 1.41 31.10 ± 1.46 32.00 ± 1.21 32.87 ± 1.12
NC 29.20 ± 1.46 26.10 ± 1.63 22.82 ± 1.08Ac 19.6 ± 1.28 Ac
GL5 29.70 ± 1.47 28.60 ± 1.48 28.10 ± 1.50 28.00 ± 1.58Bc
RELE100 29.18 ± 1.58 27.40 ± 1.28 26.52 ± 1.29Aa 26.04 ± 1.42 BaAa
RELE200 29.7 ± 0.99 28.32 ± 0.98 27.28 ± 1.31 27.2 ± 1.27 BaAa
RELE400 27.80 ± 0.86 26.40 ± 0.83 26.00 ± 0.83Aa 25.9 ± 0.71 BaAa

Note: Each value represents mean ± S.E.M; n = 6; Analysis was performed by one way ANOVA; acompared to normal control; bcompared to negative control; number followed by RELE and GL indicates dose in mg/kg; ap < 0.05; bp < 0.001.

Abbreviations: NOC, normal control; NC, negative control; GL, glibenclamide; RELE, Rubus erlangeri leaf extract.