Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 24;4:1001. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02526-y

Fig. 5. Comparison of SW620 tumour cells response to different schedules of topoisomerase-I inhibitor and AZD0156 in the microfluidic Ibidi chip versus mouse in vivo study.

Fig. 5

SW620 tumour spheroids were treated with SN38 and two different gapped schedules with the ATM inhibitor in Ibidi microfluidic chip using 8-concentration profile over 24 h (Table 1), spheroids volumes were evaluated at day 7 of post-treatment. N ≥ 5 per condition from two independent experiments. Box-plots show median (centre line); box limits are 25th to 75th percentile; whiskers represent min and max values (a); SW620 tumour xenografts were subcutaneously implanted in mice (N = 15 per group) and subjected to the same treatment schedules as the spheroids in Ibidi chip. Tumour volume was measured regularly over 40 days. The graph represents mean ± SE. Tumour volumes at days 7, 15 and 35 were plotted as box-and-whisker graphs for easier comparison with in vitro microfluidic data (median—centre line; box limits—25th to 75th percentile; whiskers—min and max values) (b). Statistical analysis was carried out using 1-way ANOVA, Tukey’s multiple comparisons, CI = 95%, ****p < 0.0001; ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.1.