Skip to main content
. 2001 Oct 5;5(6):368–375. doi: 10.1186/cc1071

Table 2.

Length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay attributable to clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding

ICU length of stay Median difference
(days) (95% confidence interval)
Crude comparison
 Non-survivors 14.0 (8.6–19.4)
 Overall 17.2 (13.2–21.3)
Matched cohort method
 Non-survivors 0.6 (-5.1–6.3)
 Overall 3.8 (-0.01–7.6)
Model-based matched cohort method
 Matching on mortality status 5.1 (0.3–9.9)
 Overall 6.7 (2.7–10.7)
Regression method
 Unadjusted 7.9 (1.4–14.4)
 Adjusted* 6.2 (1.0–11.4)

The model-based matched cohort probably yields the best estimate of the length of ICU stay. See Table 3 for advantages and disadvantages of these methods. * Adjusted for age, APACHE II score, admitting diagnosis, duration of ventilation, Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score, and bleeding status.