Table 2.
ICU length of stay | Median difference |
(days) | (95% confidence interval) |
Crude comparison | |
Non-survivors | 14.0 (8.6–19.4) |
Overall | 17.2 (13.2–21.3) |
Matched cohort method | |
Non-survivors | 0.6 (-5.1–6.3) |
Overall | 3.8 (-0.01–7.6) |
Model-based matched cohort method | |
Matching on mortality status | 5.1 (0.3–9.9) |
Overall | 6.7 (2.7–10.7) |
Regression method | |
Unadjusted | 7.9 (1.4–14.4) |
Adjusted* | 6.2 (1.0–11.4) |
The model-based matched cohort probably yields the best estimate of the length of ICU stay. See Table 3 for advantages and disadvantages of these methods. * Adjusted for age, APACHE II score, admitting diagnosis, duration of ventilation, Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score, and bleeding status.