Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2020 Sep 23;408:115250. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2020.115250

Table 2.

Serum and Liver PFOS Concentration

SD SD +PFOS H-SD H-SD +PFOS HFD HFD +PFOS

Serum (μg/mL) <LLOQ 40.0 ± 6.9 <LLOQ 34.8 ± 6.1 <LLOQ 42.4 ± 2.0
Liver PFOS (μg PFOS/g tissue) <LLOQ 200.2 ± 22.5 <LLOQ 148.0 ± 16.1 * <LLOQ 137.0 ± 32.8 *
Total Liver PFOS (μg PFOS) 363.5 ± 20.2 272.7 ± 18.0 * 354.1 ± 38.4
Liver/Serum Ratio 5.2 ± 0.33 4.4 ± 0.44 3.3 ± 0.34 *
Serum PFOS (mg PFOS/mL per mg of PFOS consumed) 2.32 ± 0.14 2.19 ± 0.14 6.01 ± 0.13 *
Liver PFOS (mg PFOS/g tissue per mg of PFOS consumed) 11.6 ± 0.5 9.3 ± 0.4 19.4 ± 2.1 *

Male C57BL/6N mice were fed either control standard chow diet (SD) or a 60% kCal high fat diet (HFD).After 4 weeks, half of HFD mice were switched to a SD (H-SD) to induce weight loss, and mice were further divided with a subset having 0.0003% PFOS in diet. Mice were kept on study for an additional 10 weeks. PFOS was extracted from liver and serum and quantified using LC-MS/MS. All mice that were not dosed with PFOS had concentrations below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ, 15 ng/mL, 3 μg/g tissue).Total liver PFOS was calculated by multiplying concentration by total liver weights and PFOS concentrations were also normalized to average food consumption within each diet group. The HFD and H-SD mice had a lower liver PFOS concentration, and the H-SD mice had less overall liver PFOS. The HFD mice had a higher liver and serum PFOS concentration relative to the amount of PFOS consumed within the diet. Calculations were performed using a one-way ANOVA followed by Fisher’s LSD test. All values are means ± SD; N=5–8.

*

indicates p<0.05 versus SD+PFOS

indicates p<0.05 for H-SD+PFOS versus HFD+PFOS.