Table 3.
Scores | SD | SD +PFOS | H-SD | H-SD+PFOS | HFD | HFD +PFOS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
0 | 6/8 | 4/5 | 7/8 | 3/6 | 0/7 | 0/6 |
1 | 2/8 | 1/5 | 0/8 | 1/6 | 0/7 | 0/6 |
2 | 0/8 | 0/5 | 1/8 | 2/6 | 3/7 | 0/6 |
3 | 0/8 | 0/5 | 0/8 | 0/6 | 2/7 | 1/6 |
4 | 0/8 | 0/5 | 0/8 | 0/6 | 2/7 | 4/6 |
5 | 0/8 | 0/5 | 0/8 | 0/6 | 0/7 | 1/6 |
| ||||||
≥3 | 0/8 (0%) | 0/5 (0%) | 0/8 (0%) ¶ | 0/6 (0%) | 4/7 (57%) * | 6/6 (100%) * |
Formalin fixed hepatic tissue sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (Fig. 2A). Livers were scored for lipid accumulation (range from 0 to 5, where 0 is the least and 5 is most severe). Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test for multiple comparisons. N=5–8/treatment group
indicates p<0.05 versus SD
indicates p<0.05 for H-SD versus HFD.