Table 2.
Multinomial logistic regression analysis of the degree of acceptance of robots and pets by middle-aged and older adults (N=240).a
Characteristic | Preference of robot or pet as a companion | |||
|
Both robots and pets are highly acceptable (n=81, 33.8% [OR]) | Prefer robots (n=42, 17.5% [OR]) | Prefer pets (n=56, 23.3% [OR]) | |
Age, years (reference: ≥75 years old) |
|
|
|
|
|
45-54 | 1.392 | 0.982 | 1.849 |
|
55-64 | 0.896 | 1.953 | 1.649 |
|
65-74 | 1.066 | 2.234 | 1.129 |
Number of comorbidities | 0.877 | 1.688* | 1.348 | |
Lives alone | 0.484 | 0.664 | 0.275 | |
Male gender | 0.863 | 1.173 | 1.646 | |
Education level (reference: above university) |
|
|
|
|
|
Below primary school | 0.939 | 0.645 | 1.593 |
|
Secondary school/senior high school (higher vocational school) | 0.759 | 0.370 | 1.080 |
Retired | 0.555 | 1.015 | 0.771 | |
Has experience using robots | 0.933 | 0.734 | 0.358 | |
Has experience using the internet | 0.471 | 0.368 | 3.350 | |
Can download and use apps | 0.271 | 0.170* | 0.159* | |
Has experience with keeping pets | 3.527** | 0.784 | 2.498* | |
Social support score | 0.969 | 0.953 | 0.977 | |
eHealth Literacy Scale score | 1.084* | 1.139** | 1.100* |
aContrast group: neither robots nor pets are acceptable (n=61; 25.4%).
*P<.05; **P<.01; and ***P<.001.