Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2019 Apr 22;41(3):485–494. doi: 10.1007/s10862-019-09736-z

Table 3.

Multiple linear and binary logistic regressions assessing the predictive validity of the DERS-36 and multiple short form total scores on all outcomes

Predictor Variables and Outcomes DERS-36 DERS-16 DERS-SF DERS-18

Multiple linear regression: b(s.e.)
 BPD .45(.01)*a .79(.03)*a,b .85(.03)*b .84(.03)*b
 Depression .13(.01)*a .21(.01)*b .24(.01)*a,b .24(.01)*a,b
 Anxiety .09(.01)*a .16(.01)*a .17(.01)*a .17(.01)*a
Binary logistic regression: OR(s.e.)
 Suicidality 1.03(.01)*a 1.04(.01)*a 1.05(.01)*a 1.05(.01)*a
 Self-harm 1.04(.01)*a 1.06(.01)*a 1.07(.01)*a 1.07(.01)*a
 Disordered Eating 1.02(.003)*a 1.04(.01)*a 1.05(.01)*a 1.05(.01)*a
 Substance Use 1.01(.002)a 1.01(.004)a 1.01(.01)a 1.01(.01)*a
*

Significant after Bonferonni corrections at p < .002. Different subscripts per row indicate significant differences between DERS forms using Dunn and Clark’ (1969) z test