Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 13;115(4):720–775. [Article in Portuguese] doi: 10.36660/abc.20201047

Table 85. Treatment in prosthesis dysfunction during pregnancy.

Biological prosthesis Mechanical prosthesis
Maternal risk Fetal risk Maternal risk Fetal risk
Dysfunction with predominant regurgitation, NYHA FC I/II and normal LVEF
Consider pharmacological measures
Low risk Dysfunction with mild to moderate “paravalvular” regurgitation, without significant hemolysis or severe heart failure
Consider pharmacological measures for heart failure and anemia
Severe MR or significant hemolysis
Consider intervention
Heart failure and/or symptomatic hemolysis
Consider percutaneous closure of the paravalvular leak or surgery (high risk of relapse)
High fetal risk, if surgery
Dysfunction with predominant valve stenosis and calcification (mitral, aortic, or tricuspid)
Risks of severe heart failure, shock, sudden death
Always consider percutaneous or transapical (valve-in-valve) implantation or surgery
High fetal risk
Fetal loss
Prematurity
Mechanical prosthesis thrombosis
Consider emergency intervention (thrombolysis or surgery)
Mechanical prosthesis stenosis due to intravalvular endothelial growth – pannus or mismatch
Need for intervention is rare
If necessary, consider surgery
High fetal risk, if surgery

FC: functional class; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; MR: mitral regurgitation.