Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Jun 24;82:111–121. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2021.06.021

Table 2:

Description of the demonstration database (7 cases imaged at both field strengths): lesion type, BI-RADS designation, age at imaging, time between imaging at the two field strengths, maximum lesion diameter (radiomic feature S4) as extracted from imaging at each field strength, and voxel resolution at each field strength. As available from radiological reports, additional information is given in the lesion type field. ME represents mass-enhancement, while NMLE stands for non-mass-like enhancement.

Subject
number
Lesion Type BI-
RADS
Age at
imaging
(years)
Time between imaging at the
two field strengths (days)
Maximum
lesion
diameter
(radio
mic
feature
S4)
(mm)
Voxel resolution
(given as x × y
× z, mm)
1.5
T
3.0
T
1.5 T 3.0 T
1 Benign 2 48 90 60.0 74.3 0.71 × 0.71 × 2 0.75 × 0.75 × 1.6
2 Benign (amorphous calcifications, NMLE) 4 61 20 76.7 75.0 0.75 × 0.75 × 2 0.75 × 0.75 × 1.6
3 Benign (fibroepithelial lesion) 4 40 1 15.0 13.2 0.76 × 0.76 × 1.6 0.75 × 0.75 × 1.6
4 HR+/HER2− (pleomorphic calcifications, ME within NMLE) 6 42 11 87.6 91.9 0.75 × 0.75 × 2 0.75 × 0.75 × 1.6
5 HR+/HER2− (ME) 6 51 16 20.5 18.6 0.74 × 0.74 × 2 0.74 × 0.74 × 1.6
6 HR+/HER2− (ME) 6 35 2 24.3 21.2 0.76 × 0.76 × 2 0.60 × 0.60 × 1.6
7 HR+/HER2− (NMLE) 6 60 7 108.0 110.8 0.76 × 0.76 × 2 0.74 × 0.74 × 1.6