Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 9;18(4):817–824. doi: 10.1007/s10388-021-00853-x

Table 2.

Lesion status and the best response to repeated tPDT for the same lesion

Lesion no (n = 12) Lesion status before 2nd tPDT for each lesion
Location T stage Length (mm) Circumference Size compared with the lesion size before the initial tPDT for each lesion Response of 2nd tPDT for each lesion Total number of tPDT Best response of repeated tPDT for each lesion
Lesion 1–1 Primary site TX 10 ≤ 1/4 No change or increased Non L-CR 3 Non L-CR
Lesion 3–1 Primary site T2 20 > 1/4, ≤ 1/2 No change or increased Non L-CR 2 Non L-CR
Lesion 4–1 Primary site T1 12 > 1/4, ≤ 1/2 No change or increased Non L-CR 2 Non L-CR
Lesion 5–1 Primary site T1 4 ≤ 1/4 Decreased L-CR 2 L-CR
Lesion 6–1 Primary site T1 5 ≤ 1/4 Decreased Non L-CR 4 Non L-CR
Lesion 6–2 Metachronous site T2 30 > 1/4, ≤ 1/2 No change or increased L-CR 2 L-CR
Lesion 7–1 Primary site T2 30 > 1/4, ≤ 1/2 Decreased Non L-CR 4 L-CR
Lesion 8–1 Primary site T1 10 ≤ 1/4 Decreased L-CR 2 L-CR
Lesion 9–5 Metachronous site T1 10 ≤ 1/4 No change or increased Non L-CR 3 Non L-CR
Lesion 10–1 Primary site T1 15 ≤ 1/4 No change or increased Non L-CR 3 Non L-CR
Lesion 11–1 Primary site T1 10 > 1/4, ≤ 1/2 No change or increased Non L-CR 2 Non L-CR
Lesion 13–1 Primary site T2 20 ≤ 1/4 Decreased L-CR 2 L-CR
Lesion L-CR rate 33.3% (4/12) 41.7% (5/12)