Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 26;23(Suppl C):C204–C220. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suab074

Table 3.

Clinical studies regarding the use of IABP in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction

Study Design Patients (n) STEMI Shock definition Treatment Control Primary endpoint Result Follow-up
Ohman et al.31 RCT 57 100% Hypotension TL No IABP Total mortality NS 6 months
Sjauw et al.57 Meta-Analysis 1009 100% NA PCI No IABP Total mortality NS 30 days
Sjauw et al.57 Meta-Analysis 10529 100% NA TL No IABP Total mortality Significant reduction 30 days
Prondzinsky et al.56 RCT 40 65% Hypotension PCI No IABP APACHE II score NS 4 days
Abdel-Wahab et al.60 Retrospective 48 65% Hypotension PCI IABP post PCI Total mortality Significant reduction In-hospital
Romeo et al.63 Meta-Analysis 14186 NA NA No reperfusion/TL/PCI No IABP Total mortality NS In-hospital
IABP-SHOCK II16 RCT 600 69% Hypotension PCI/CABG No IABP Total mortality NS 30 days
Unverzagt et al.35 Meta-Analysis 790 NA NA PCI/TL/CABG No IABP/LVAD Total mortality NS 30 days
Hawranek et al.41 Prospective registry 991 81% Hypotension Failed PCI No IABP Total mortality Significant reduction 30 days

CABG, coronary artery by-pass grafting; IABP, intra-aortic balloon pump; LVAD, left ventricular assist devices; NA, not available; NS, non-significant; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; RCT, randomized control trial; STEMI, ST elevation myocardial infarction; TL, thrombolysis.