TABLE 3.
PMS and gene conversion frequencies in msh2Δ tetrads
| Relevant genotype | Conversion
|
PMS
|
Total no. of tetrads | Mean % ASa ± SDb | % PMSc | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6+:2− | 2+:6− | % | 5+:3− | 3+:5− | ab4+:4−d | % | ||||
| sup3-UGA/sup3-UGA,r36 | ||||||||||
| msh2+/msh2+e | 7 | 9 | 1.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.1 | 1,105 | 1.5 ± 0.37 | 5.9 |
| msh2Δ/msh2Δ | 0 | 1 | 0.2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1.9 | 514 | 2.1 ± 0.63 | 91 |
| ade6+/ade6-M26 | ||||||||||
| msh2+/msh2+f | 46 | 6 | 5.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,018 | 5.1 ± 0.69 | <1.9 |
| msh2Δ/msh2Δ | 3 | 1 | 0.9 | 15 | 2 | 3 | 5.2 | 445 | 6.1 ± 1.13 | 85 |
a
AS, aberrant segregations.
b
SD = [p(100 − p)/n]1/2, where p is the percentage of aberrant segregations and n is the total number of tetrads analyzed.
c
Calculated as PMS events (5+:3− + 3+:5− + 2 × ab4+:4−)/total number of aberrant segregations.
d
Aberrant 4+:4− tetrads were counted as two PMS events.
e
Data from Schär et al. (60).
f
Data from Gutz et al. (29).