Table 2.

Male white-tailed deer spatial-capture recapture parameter estimates. Estimates of the posterior means for male white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) abundance (N), intensity function intercept (β₀), the effect of bait on deer activity center density (β₁), baseline encounter probabilities for both passive (p₀ [passive]) and baited cameras (p₀ [baited]), and the scaling parameter of the half-normal detection function (σ) from summer (2015) and winter (2016) camera surveys in southwestern Georgia, USA.

			Summer				Winter
Site	Parameter	Mean	SD	2.5%	97.5%	Mean	SD	2.5%	97.5%
A	N	261.5	8.925	247.0	282.0	214.0	5.167	205.0	225.0
	β 0	3.247	0.140	2.972	3.521	2.133	0.134	1.869	2.392
	β 1	−2.621	0.416	−3.456	−1.838	−0.734	0.223	−1.182	−0.309
	p0 [passive]	0.028	0.002	0.023	0.033	0.012	0.001	0.010	0.015
	p0 [baited]	0.673	0.017	0.641	0.707	0.414	0.011	0.393	0.436
	σ	0.338	0.004	0.331	0.345	0.607	0.008	0.592	0.623
B	N	138.6	8.041	124.0	155.0	100.3	1.180	99.0	103.0
	β 0	1.529	0.125	1.312	1.805	1.112	0.099	0.922	1.315
	β 1	−0.210	0.174	−0.651	−0.007	−0.081	0.074	−0.275	−0.002
	p0 [passive]	0.028	0.004	0.022	0.036	0.011	0.001	0.009	0.014
	p0 [baited]	0.420	0.023	0.378	0.467	0.255	0.011	0.233	0.278
	σ	0.487	0.012	0.463	0.510	0.872	0.018	0.838	0.907
C	N	168.5	14.598	141.0	198.0	108.2	4.387	101.0	118.0
	β 0	1.940	0.124	1.719	2.207	1.367	0.108	1.160	1.589
	β 1	−0.302	0.237	−0.874	−0.011	−0.108	0.097	−0.358	−0.003
	p0 [passive]	0.020	0.003	0.014	0.027	0.014	0.002	0.010	0.018
	p0 [baited]	0.370	0.021	0.331	0.411	0.244	0.014	0.219	0.272
	σ	0.375	0.009	0.358	0.394	0.652	0.019	0.615	0.691
D	N	104.6	8.606	89.0	123.0	85.5	2.349	82.0	91.0
	β 0	1.459	0.183	1.137	1.848	1.141	0.174	0.832	1.511
	β 1	−0.509	0.333	−1.263	−0.031	−0.327	0.223	−0.838	−0.016
	p0 [passive]	0.022	0.004	0.015	0.030	0.013	0.002	0.009	0.018
	p0 [baited]	0.457	0.025	0.409	0.506	0.263	0.013	0.239	0.289
	σ	0.443	0.012	0.421	0.467	0.750	0.019	0.713	0.789