Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 29;10(8):1218. doi: 10.3390/antiox10081218

Table 8.

Hypoglycaemic and hypolipidemic activity (%) of jam.

Sample α-Amylase α-Glucosidase Lipase
Enriched jam
EMT1 91.23 ± 3.25 **** 103.56 ± 3.58 **** 96.74 ± 3.58 ****
EMT2 86.94 ± 2.87 **** 92.79 ± 3.42 **** 91.74 ± 3.24 ****
EMT3 85.18 ± 2.47 **** 87.46 ± 2.92 ** 88.76 ± 2.97 ****
Pasteurised enriched jam
EMTP1 84.96 ± 3.01 **** 89.78 ± 3.25 **** 86.97 ± 3.17 ****
EMTP2 80.12 ± 2.85 **** 86.41 ± 3.18 **** 82.48 ± 3.12 ****
EMTP3 76.37 ± 2.74 **** 80.14 ± 2.86 *** 80.16 ± 2.95 ****
Negative control
EMP 65.57 ± 2.45 71.58 ± 2.67 63.78 ± 2.39

EM: jam without almond skin; EMT1: enriched jam with 20% of T; EMT2: enriched jam with 15% of T; EMT3: enriched jam with 10% of T; EMP: jam without almond skin; EMTP1: enriched jam with 20% of T; EMTP2: enriched jam with 15% of T; EMTP3: enriched jam with 10% of T. Differences within and between groups were evaluated by one-way ANOVA followed by a multi-comparison Dunnett’s test (α = 0.05): **** p < 0.0001; *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01 compared with the negative control.