Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 23;10(8):707. doi: 10.3390/biology10080707

Table 1.

Gamma oscillations in AD mouse models.

Mouse Model Age (Months) Sex Preparation Frequency Band (Hz) Changes in γ Oscillations Reference
APP/PS1 4–5 NA EC slices 20–60 Reduced γ frequency in LEC
No effect in MEC
[139]
J20 4–7 M/F in vivo cEEG 20–80 Reduced γ power [140]
7–8 M/F in vivo cEEG 30–90 Reduced γ power [141]
5xFAD 3 M in vivo LFP in CA1 20–50 Reduced γ power during SWRs [89]
TgCRND8 1 NA HC slices θ: 3–12
low γ: 25–85
high γ: 120–250
No change in γ power
Disrupted θ–γ coupling
[142]
1 M in vivo HC LFP low γ: 25–45
high γ: 60–100
Reduced γ power [143]
APOE4 5–17 F in vivo HC LFP 30–50 Reduced γ power [144]
4–5 F in vivo HC LFP 30–50 Reduced γ power during SWRs [145]
3R tau overexpression 7 M HC slices 50–90 Reduced γ power and peak frequency [146]

cEEG, cortical EEG. EC, entorhinal cortex. HC, hippocampus. LFP, local field potential. LEC, lateral EC. MEC, medial EC. SWR, sharp wave-ripple.