Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 4;10(8):745. doi: 10.3390/biology10080745

Table 5.

Cultural and morphological comparisons of new species and their closely related species.

Species CYA 25 °C (mm) CYA 37 °C (mm) MEA (mm) YES (mm) Conidia Shape Conidia Wall Conidia Size (μm) Reference
T. chongqingensis 12–13 no growth 17–18 18–19 ellipsoidal to broad fusiform smooth 2.5–3.5 × 2–2.5 This study
T. minioluteus 17–18 no growth 21–22 18 ellipsoidal smooth 2.5–4 × 1.5–2.5 [24]
T. minnesotensis 24–26 no growth 13–15 21–24 ellipsoidal smooth 2.5–3.5 × 2–3 [5]
T. udagawae 6–8 no growth 10–11 8–9 subglobose to ellipsoidal smooth 3–4 × 2–3 [24]
T. cnidii 30–35 17–20 38–43 40–45 ellipsodial smooth to finely rough 3–4 × 2–2.5 [25]
T. siamensis 20–22 15 32–33 27–28 ellipsoidal to fusiform smooth to finely rough 3–4 × 2–3 [24]
T. wushanicus 21–24 17–19 40–44 24–28 ellipsoidal to broad fusiform smooth to finely rough 3–4 × 2.5–3 This study