Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 28;69(31):8591–8609. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c01871

Table 1. Comparison of Three Different Data Acquisition Methods Employed in Bottom-Up Proteomicsa.

bottom-up proteomics acquisition methods
data-dependent acquisition (DDA) quantitative MS/MS data-independent acquisition (DIA)
data analysis is easy number of peptides that can be quantified in each injection is limited (10s–100s) generates highly reproducible data
number of most abundant ions for fragmentation should be defined data analysis is easy able to quantify 10000s of peptides
lower reproducibility generates highly reproducible data information should be defined including mass range, precursor ion window width and number of MS/MS scans
generates product ion spectra of peptides for either identification or as SWATH-MS ion library highly specific and sensitive requires creation of spectral library by DDA
often used as a prerequisite for targeted MS method development requires optimization of method for target peptides data analysis and interpretation is more complex with specific software
a

Abbreviations: SWATH - sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragmentation spectra.