Table 1. Comparison of Three Different Data Acquisition Methods Employed in Bottom-Up Proteomicsa.
bottom-up
proteomics acquisition methods | ||
---|---|---|
data-dependent acquisition (DDA) | quantitative MS/MS | data-independent acquisition (DIA) |
data analysis is easy | number of peptides that can be quantified in each injection is limited (10s–100s) | generates highly reproducible data |
number of most abundant ions for fragmentation should be defined | data analysis is easy | able to quantify 10000s of peptides |
lower reproducibility | generates highly reproducible data | information should be defined including mass range, precursor ion window width and number of MS/MS scans |
generates product ion spectra of peptides for either identification or as SWATH-MS ion library | highly specific and sensitive | requires creation of spectral library by DDA |
often used as a prerequisite for targeted MS method development | requires optimization of method for target peptides | data analysis and interpretation is more complex with specific software |
Abbreviations: SWATH - sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragmentation spectra.