Table 3.
Variables | CCS¥ uptake | Multivariable analysis (initial model) | Multivariable analysis (final model) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n/N* | % | OR (CI 95%) | p value | aOR (CI 95%) | p value |
|
Age (years) | ||||||
≤ 30 | 21/383 | 5.5 | 1 | – | 1 | – |
[30–45[ | 56/359 | 15.6 | 2.5 (1.4–4.7) | 0.003 | 3.0 (1.6–5.5) | < 0.001 |
≥ 45 | 10/44 | 22.7 | 5.1 (1.8–14.3) | 0.002 | 6.2 (2.3–17.2) | < 0.001 |
Marital status | ||||||
Single | 27/291 | 9.3 | 1 | – | – | – |
Living with a partner | 60/495 | 12.1 | 1.4 (0.8–2.6) | 0.216 | – | – |
Educational level | ||||||
No formal | 10/177 | 5.7 | 1 | – | – | – |
Primary or Secondary | 41/385 | 10.7 | 1.9 (0.8–4.3) | 0.142 | 1.9 (0.9–4.2) | 0.126 |
University | 36/224 | 16.1 | 2.5 (1.0–6.0) | 0.045 | 2.8 (1.2–6.6) | 0.017 |
Monthly income (αUSD) | ||||||
≤ 40 USD | 8/69 | 11.6 | 1 | |||
40–160 | 25/397 | 6.3 | 1.0 (0.4–2.6) | 0.964 | – | – |
≥ 160 | 54/320 | 16.9 | 0.7 (0.4–1.3) | 0.213 | – | – |
Source of information on CC¥ | ||||||
Through medias | 25/529 | 4.7 | 1 | – | – | |
In an hospital | 22/87 | 25.3 | 6.1 (2.9–12.5) | < 0.001 | 5.8 (2.8–11.8) | < 0.001 |
Through relatives£ | 17/115 | 14.8 | 2.6 (1.2–5.3) | 0.012 | 2.7 (1.3–5.6) | 0.008 |
During a mass campaign | 23/55 | 41.8 | 17.6 (8.1–37.9) | < 0.001 | 18.2 (8.5–39.1) | < 0.001 |
Clarity of information | ||||||
Not clear for me | 42/672 | 6.3 | 1 | – | 1 | – |
Very clear for me | 45/114 | 39.5 | 2.3 (1.7–3.1) | < 0.001 | 2.6 (1.9–3.4) | < 0.001 |
Knowing CC¥as a preventable disease | ||||||
vNo | 15/317 | 4.7 | 1 | – | – | |
Yes | 72/469 | 15.4 | 1.8 (0.9–3.6) | 0.072 | – | – |
¥CCS: Cervical Cancer Screening
*n/N: number of women who had ever been screened for CC/Number of women per category
£Relatives: friends or parents; αUSD: United States Dollars