Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 26;11:17278. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96792-9

Table 2.

Linear mixed effects regression model testing the effects of encoding condition and word type on response time in the recognition task.

Fixed effects Random effects
Estimate SE t CI Variance SD
Intercept 988.3 32.6 30.35 924, 1054 Participant Intercept 16,887 130
Encodingt[VI] 22.1 41.9 .53  − 60, 104 Stimulus Intercept 7134 84
Encoding [VGO] 44.2 41.8 1.06  − 38, 126
Encoding [VGOP] 137.2 43.2 3.18** 53, 222
Word type  − 118.6 29.4  − 4.04***  − 177, − 60
Encoding [VI]:Word type 36.2 55.3 .65  − 72, 145
Encoding [VGO]:Word type  − 36.2 55.3  − .65  − 145, 72
Encoding [VGOP]:Word type  − 78.6 56.3  − 1.40  − 189, 32

V, visual; VI, image; VGO, gesture observation; VGOP, gesture observation and self-performance. n = 28 participants. **p < .01; *** p < .001.