Table 3.

Linear mixed effects regression model testing the effect of encoding condition and word type on accuracy in the non-EMG recognition task.

Fixed effects					Random effects
	Estimate	SE	z	CI			Variance	SD
Intercept	2.05	.22	9.16	1.61, 2.48	Participant	Intercept	1.06	1.03
Enrichment [VI]	− .53	.30	− 1.79	− 1.11, .05	Stimulus	Intercept	.29	.54
Enrichment [VGO]	− .50	.31	− 1.61	− 1.11, .11
Enrichment [VGOP]	− .61	.29	− 1.91	− 1.21, .02
Word type	1.40	.19	7.28***	1.02, 1.78
Enrichment [VI]:Word type	.43	.54	.79	− .63, 1.48
Enrichment [VGO]:Word type	.50	.55	.90	− .58, 1.58
Enrichment [VGOP]:Word type	.89	.54	1.63	− .18, 1.95

V, visual; VI, image; VGO, gesture observation; VGOP, gesture observation and self-performance. n = 28 participants. ***p < .001.