Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 19;368(16):fnab108. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnab108

Table 5.

Comparison between student (n = 33) experiences of the on-site and remote aspects in 2021. Response options, if other than five-point Likert scale, are specified in the table. Significant P-values (<0.050) are marked in bold.

Proposition Category Mean (95% CIa) Min.b Max.b Mann–Whitney U test P-value
Did you have problems with the internet connection during the laboratory exercises? Scale: never (3), 1–3 times (2), >3 times (1) On-site 2.45 (2.28–2.63) 2 3 <0.001
Remote 2.85 (2.72–2.98) 1 3
While participating on-site/online, working with my remote/on-site partner promoted my own learning On-site 4.30 (3.97–4.64) 1 5 0.013
Remote 3.85 (3.54–4.16) 2 5
I learned to work safely and aseptically in the microbiological laboratory On-site 4.85 (4.72–4.98) 4 5 <0.001
Remote 3.52 (3.12–3.91) 2 5
I learned to choose basic methods of bacteriological diagnostics by utilizing information sources On-site 4.58 (4.40–4.75) 4 5 0.917
Remote 4.55 (4.35–4.75) 3 5
I learned to draw reasonable conclusions from the results obtained On-site 4.67 (4.50–4.84) 4 5 0.931
Remote 4.64 (4.42–4.85) 3 5
I learned to process information On-site 4.61 (4.43–4.78) 4 5 0.438
Remote 4.45 (4.22–4.69) 3 5
I learned interaction skills On-site 4.18 (3.88–4.48) 2 5 0.129
Remote 3.79 (3.42–4.16) 1 5
I learned creative thinking On-site 4.06 (3.81–4.31) 3 5 0.374
Remote 3.91 (3.67–4.15) 3 5

aCI = confidence interval.

bMin./Max. = lowest and highest scores of the proposition, respectively.