Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 29;11(8):1366. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11081366

Table 9.

Quantitative evaluation on PH2 dataset (malignant).

Methods Med-Sensitivity (%) Med-Specificity (%) Med-Accuracy (%) Med-Jaccard Index (Ji) Med-Dice-Coefficient (Dc)
CV_LS [67] 26.22 45.06 34.55 0.21 0.34
MORPH_CV_LS [10] 53.86 100.00 71.74 0.54 0.70
MORPH_GAC_LS [10] 81.67 83.20 74.87 0.68 0.81
ADAPTIVE_THRESH [68] 92.70 3.72 62.59 0.62 0.76
ISODATA_THRESH [69] 24.93 21.22 23.72 0.18 0.30
MEAN_THRESH [70] 28.31 20.72 25.69 0.18 0.31
TRIANGLE_THRESH [71] 21.59 23.01 21.31 0.14 0.24
OTSU_THRESH [72] 23.07 21.22 23.16 0.17 0.29
SALIENCY_MAP [55] 36.16 87.15 59.08 0.32 0.49
SRM_OBJ [53] 99.66 10.82 57.50 0.55 0.71
EGBS_OBJ [52] 8.89 96.52 36.46 0.09 0.16
SLIC_CLUST [66] 49.10 22.22 43.14 0.40 0.57
GASISUK (Proposed) 70.39 99.50 80.94 0.70 0.82