Table 3.
Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Odds Ratio | 95% Conf.Interval | Odds Ratio | [95% Conf.Interval] | |||
Total Sugar, % energy (above vs below median) |
2.33 | 1.298 | 4.183 | 1.69 | 1.008 | 2.817 |
Added Sugars, % energy (above vs below median) |
2.64 | 1.459 | 4.789 | 1.80 | 1.046 | 3.124 |
Added Sugars ≥10% energy | 2.57 | 1.398 | 4.717 | 1.77 | 1.008 | 3.096 |
Results following mixed effects logistic regression; for total sugars population median was used; reference population were children <50th percentile. Model 1 includes: animal- and plant- protein, non-milk dairy, fruit, and vegetable intakes, adjusted for energy; Model 2 includes: macronutrient intakes (fiber, fat, protein, other non-sugar carbohydrates). Both models were adjusted for children’s and adolescent’s activity level (IPAQ), total screen time and for the primary guardian’s educational level and professional status. Significance at α = 5%.