Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 13;13(16):4080. doi: 10.3390/cancers13164080

Table 4.

Response categories for patients monitored by CE-CT and FDG-PET/CT .

Treatment Actions Response Categories a
Study Groups CR/CMR PR/PMR SD/SMD PD/PMD MR/MMR EA/EMA
CE-CT Scans followed by progression-induced treatment change b (n = 44) 0 (0) 1 (2.3) 8 (18.2) 34 (77.3) 0 (0) 1 (2.3)
Total scans c (N = 286) 11 (3.8) 24 (8.4) 202 (70.6) 43 (15) 2 (0.7) 4 (1.4)
PET/CT Scans followe by progression-induced treatment change b (n = 22) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 21 (95.5) 1 (4.5) 0 (0)
Total scans c (N = 189) 42 (22.2) 45 (23.8) 59 (31.2) 35 (18.5) 4 (2.1) 4 (2.1)

CE-CT: contrast-enhanced computed tomography; FDG-PET/CT: fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with integrated computed-tomography; CR: complete response; PR: partial response; SD: stable disease; PD: progressive disease; MR: mixed response; EA: equivocal answer; CMR: complete metabolic response; PMR: partial metabolic response; SMD: stable metabolic disease; PMD: progressive metabolic disease; MMR: mixed metabolic response; EMA: equivocal metabolic answer. a Data have been shown as frequency (percentage) of each line. b Progression-induced treatment change defined as progression observed in imaging and/or clinical progression resulting in treatment change. c Scans from opposite modality were excluded in both study groups.