Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 19;18(16):8769. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168769

Table 3.

Session 3–4 Feedback (Room 2—Inboard Headwall).

Session and Room
Configuration
Built
Environment Permanence
Strength (St) Movement (Mv) Decision-Making (Dm) Manipulation (Ma) Perception (Pe)
Sessions 3–4
Inline graphic
Workspace Envelope Room has lots of angles; bathroom on footwall might be closer but creates unsupported walking Lots of turning and torquing; toilet placement wrong—too much turning; a short triangle of bed/bathroom/ chair might work Bathroom door visible once you get out of bed; do not see the toilet No clearance for staff assistance at the patient chair Nurse can see patient head; bathroom feels far away from bed; chair seems far from bathroom
Personal Workspace Sink in front of/close to toilet Chair looks wedged in by sofa—a disincentive to use? (feels like more space in AR than shown in plan)
Products Bed rail and wall rail for fairly continuous support; maybe need an additional wall grab bar in bathroom for support to toilet; double bars at toilet would be better—rail on far side; rail at toilet provides support to sink, but no support sink to door; hold bed to get to chair—not good support Over-bed table in the way; mobile workstation (WOW), not in model, could be an obstruction at the bed (not sure whether WOW gets moved back to proper spot) Manipulation of door with IV can be difficult