Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 19;18(16):8769. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168769

Table 4.

Session 5–7 Feedback (Room 3—Inboard Headwall).

Session and Room
Configuration
Built
Environment Permanence
Strength (St) Movement (Mv) Decision-Making (Dm) Manipulation (Ma) Perception (Pe)
Sessions 5–7
Inline graphic
Workspace Envelope Shorter walk to toilet; chair at footwall corner closer to toilet than other layout (decision to move chair from sofa corner for better distance / mobility); chair better at footwall; room seems smaller; generous space at chair, but patient and family cannot see TV.
No support to the bathroom door—use IV pole/ headwall ledge for support
Wall-mounted monitor would be in the way; have to do a 180 degree turn for toilet and back up, but less torquing; it “looked” better when someone else was getting to toilet, but it is not; potential conflicts with work flow if staff use footwall area; straight path to bed from chair, but over-bed table in the way; maybe bathroom should be on family zone side verses nurse work space Bathroom layout makes it more visible than Session 2 Manipulate door, but pretty easy if door pulls out; no room at toilet for nurse to assist—narrow Side chair looks like an obstacle; feels tight; I see an obstacle course—room cluttered with furniture
Personal Workspace Walls on either side of toilet can be used as a brace, feels safer, but bars on both sides of toilet would be better
Products Want to use bed opposite chair for support (sit/stand)