Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 8;13(16):3998. doi: 10.3390/cancers13163998

Table 2.

Log-rank scores from a comparison of high/low standardized maximal distances (SDmax) for each method (Euclidian, Manhattan, Tchebychev, Travelling Salesman Problem distance, and Euclidian, Manhattan, Tchebychev voxels based) with the number of events, 4-year PFS (4y-PFS) and 4-year OS (4y-OS). Log-rank scores revealed significant differences in PFS and OS between high/low SDmax with all methods.

Method SDmax
_Euc
SDmax
_Man
SDmax
_Tch
SDTSP SDmax
_Euc_Vox
SDmax
_Man_Vox
SDmax
_Tch_Vox
Kappa SDmax_Euc NA 0.84 0.92 0.64 0.87 0.85 0.82
PFS HR 2.90 2.70 3.11 2.95 3.58 2.84 3.66
95% CI 1.8–4.7 1.7–4.2 2.0–4.9 1.7–5.1 2.2–5.8 1.8–4.5 2.2–6.1
p-value <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
Se 0.27 0.32 0.30 0.18 0.25 0.30 0.23
Sp 0.90 0.87 0.89 0.92 0.92 0.89 0.93
OS HR 2.66 2.60 2.90 3.11 3.10 2.85 2.93
95% CI 1.4–4.8 1.5–4.6 1.6–5.2 1.6–6.0 1.7–5.7 1.6–5.1 1.5–5.6
p-value 0.0013 0.0009 0.0003 0.0008 0.0003 0.0004 0.0011
Se 0.28 0.33 0.31 0.20 0.26 0.31 0.22
Sp 0.88 0.84 0.87 0.91 0.89 0.87 0.91