Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 5;3(6):106–109. doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2021.028

Table 1. The awareness of brucellosis knowledge and the relationship between their seroprevalence among high-risk populations in Shanxi and Xinjiang from 2019 to 2020.

Questions Having awareness Infected Uninfected Total Awareness rate (%) Seroprevalence (%) P-value
* The response was depended on those who answered “yes” for the first question.
These were multiple-choice questions. The “yes” means who answered more than 70% of the questions correctly.
§ The “yes” means who answered all five questions correctly.
Results from Fisher’s exact test.
** The seroprevalence difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).
All 62 2,322 2,384 2.60
Have you heard of brucellosis? Yes 60 2,248 2,308 96.81 2.60 1.000
No 2 74 76 2.63
What behaviors may cause a person to contract brucellosis? *,† Yes 29 1,165 1,194 50.08 2.43 0.597
No 33 1,157 1,190 2.77
Can brucellosis be prevented? * Yes 35 1,623 1,658 69.55 2.11 0.023 **
No 27 699 726 3.72
What are the symptoms of brucellosis? *,† Yes 27 1,207 1,234 51.76 2.19 0.190
No 35 1,115 1,150 3.04
Which domestic animals can transmit brucellosis? *,† Yes 13 747 760 31.88 1.71 0.062
No 49 1,575 1,624 3.02
Awareness § Yes 8 415 423 17.74 1.89 0.312
No 54 1,907 1,961 2.75