Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 13;13(16):4086. doi: 10.3390/cancers13164086

Table 2.

Risk factors for decreased kidney function among all patients and eGFR groups.

Risk Factors for Decreased Kidney Function Odds Ratio 95% CI P
Univariate regression (n = 1420)
Diagnosis (n = 1420) - - 0.0065
ET vs. MF (n = 942) 0.674 0.525–0.867 0.0021
ET vs. PV (n = 1024) 0.926 0.730–1.174 0.5243
MF vs. PV (n = 874) 1.372 1.060–1.777 0.0160
JAK2V617F mutation (yes vs. no; n = 1315) 1.244 0.981–1.576 0.0711
eGFR2 vs. eGFR1 (n = 1030) 1.033 0.764–1.395 0.8347
eGFR3 vs. eGFR1 (n = 576) 1.435 0.982–2.097 0.0619
eGFR3 vs. eGFR2 (n = 1024) 1.390 1.005–1.922 0.0464
Diabetes mellitus (yes vs. no; n = 1251) 1.815 1.215–2.711 0.0036
eGFR2 vs. eGFR1 (n = 976) 0.663 0.382–1.153 0.1454
eGFR3 vs. eGFR1 (n = 542) 1.878 1.071–3.295 0.0279
eGFR3 vs. eGFR2 (n = 984) 2.830 1.763–4.543 <0.0001
Arterial hypertension (yes vs. no; n = 956) 2.419 1.879–3.114 <0.0001
eGFR2 vs. eGFR1 (n = 739) 1.405 1.016–1.943 0.0399
eGFR3 vs. eGFR1 (n = 436) 3.983 2.671–5.939 <0.0001
eGFR3 vs. eGFR2 (n = 737) 2.836 2.023–3.976 <0.0001
Hyperlipidemia (yes vs. no; n = 181) 3.570 1.445–8.819 0.0058
eGFR2 vs. eGFR1 (n = 152) 1.815 0.477–6.905 0.3820
eGFR3 vs. eGFR1 (n = 81) 6.220 1.501–25.779 0.0118
eGFR3 vs. eGFR2 (n = 129) 3.429 1.207–9.739 0.0207
Leukocytes (>8.4 vs. ≤8.4 G/L; n = 1408) 1.367 1.116–1.675 0.0025
eGFR2 vs. eGFR1 (n = 1093) 1.023 0.785–1.333 0.8670
eGFR3 vs. eGFR1 (n = 619) 1.624 1.181–2.231 0.0028
eGFR3 vs. eGFR2 (n = 1104) 1.587 1.218–2.067 0.0006
Platelets (>492 vs. ≤492 G/L; n = 1395) 0.832 0.679–1.019 0.0755
eGFR2 vs. eGFR1 (n = 1080) 1.078 0.827–1.406 0.5774
eGFR3 vs. eGFR1 (n = 618) 0.755 0.550–1.036 0.0814
eGFR3 vs. eGFR2 (n = 1092) 0.700 0.538–0.911 0.0079
Uric acid (>5.7 vs. ≤5.7 mg/dL; n = 1012) 2.548 1.986–3.268 <0.0001
eGFR2 vs. eGFR1 (n = 790) 1.587 1.150–2.192 0.0050
eGFR3 vs. eGFR1 (n = 444) 4.351 2.923–6.476 <0.0001
eGFR3 vs. eGFR2 (n = 790) 2.741 1.971–3.811 <0.0001
Absolute neutrophil count (>5.48 vs. ≤5.48 G/L; n = 1254) 1.397 1.126–1.734 0.0024
eGFR2 vs. eGFR1 (n = 981) 1.077 0.814–1.426 0.6019
eGFR3 vs. eGFR1 (n = 545) 1.690 1.204–2.373 0.0024
eGFR3 vs. eGFR2 (n = 982) 1.569 1.183–2.081 0.0018
Absolute monocyte count (>0.55 vs. ≤0.55 G/L; n = 1312) 1.349 1.094–1.664 0.0052
eGFR2 vs. eGFR1 (n = 1018) 0.972 0.739–1.278 0.8382
eGFR3 vs. eGFR1 (n = 579) 1.589 1.144–2.207 0.0058
eGFR3 vs. eGFR2 (n = 1027) 1.635 1.243–2.150 0.0004
LDH (>267.5 vs. ≤267.5 U/L; n = 1356) 1.533 1.245–1.887 <0.0001
eGFR2 vs. eGFR1 (n = 1056) 1.197 0.913–1.570 0.1940
eGFR3 vs. eGFR1 (n = 592) 1.949 1.405–2.703 <0.0001
eGFR3 vs. eGFR2 (n = 1064) 1.628 1.241–2.136 0.0004
CRP (>1.4 vs. ≤1.4 mg/L; n = 356) 1.633 1.091–2.444 0.0172
eGFR2 vs. eGFR1 (n = 273) 0.980 0.579–1.660 0.9411
eGFR3 vs. eGFR1 (n = 162) 2.109 1.125–3.953 0.0200
eGFR3 vs. eGFR2 (n = 277) 2.151 1.269–3.645 0.0044
MPN duration (>42 vs. ≤42 months; n = 1183) 1.507 1.207–1.882 0.0003
eGFR2 vs. eGFR1 (n = 904) 1.482 1.101–1.996 0.0095
eGFR3 vs. eGFR1 (n = 523) 1.913 1.350–2.710 0.0003
eGFR3 vs. eGFR2 (n = 939) 1.290 0.973–1.710 0.0764
MPN therapy (yes vs. WW; n = 1215) * 1.784 1.428–2.230 <0.0001
eGFR2 vs. eGFR1 (n = 941) 1.267 0.952–1.686 0.1049
eGFR3 vs. eGFR1 (n = 535) 2.514 1.762–3.587 <0.0001
eGFR3 vs. eGFR2 (n = 939) 1.985 1.470–2.679 <0.0001
HU-treated (yes vs. WW; n = 780) 1.734 1.286–2.338 0.0003
eGFR2 vs. eGFR1 (n = 639) 1.639 1.099–2.444 0.0153
eGFR3 vs. eGFR1 (n = 316) 2.421 1.493–3.926 0.0003
eGFR3 vs. eGFR2 (n = 605) 1.477 1.004–2.172 0.0475
RUX-treated (yes vs. WW; n = 618) 2.412 1.560–3.728 <0.0001
eGFR2 vs. eGFR1 (n = 506) 1.517 0.810–2.842 0.1928
eGFR3 vs. eGFR1 (n = 260) 3.663 1.839–7.294 0.0002
eGFR3 vs. eGFR2 (n = 470) 2.413 1.446–4.027 0.0007
Other MPN treatment (yes vs. WW; n = 865) 1.737 1.331–2.267 <0.0001
eGFR2 vs. eGFR1 (n = 682) 1.006 0.714–1.417 0.9734
eGFR3 vs. eGFR1 (n = 389) 2.344 1.557–3.527 <0.0001
eGFR3 vs. eGFR2 (n = 659) 2.330 1.647–3.297 <0.0001
Antithrombotic therapy (yes vs. no; n = 1251) 1.196 0.946–1.511 0.1348
eGFR2 vs. eGFR1 (n = 967) 1.296 0.958–1.752 0.0925
eGFR3 vs. eGFR1 (n = 548) 1.318 0.918–1.892 0.1314
eGFR3 vs. eGFR2 (n = 939) 1.017 0.750–1.380 0.9113
Multiple Regression
eGFR2 vs. eGFR1 (n = 639) * - - -
HU-treated (yes vs. WW) 1.639 1.099–2.444 0.0153
eGFR3 vs. eGFR1 (n = 278) †,‡ - - -
Arterial hypertension (yes vs. no) 3.073 1.746–5.405 <0.0001
Uric acid (>5.7 vs. ≤ 5.7 mg/dL) 4.918 2.787–8.677 <0.0001
HU-treated (yes vs. WW) 3.509 1.630–7.557 0.0013
RUX-treated (yes vs. WW) 5.416 1.927–15.223 0.0014
Other MPN treatment (yes vs. WW) 2.477 1.277–4.803 0.0073
eGFR3 vs. eGFR2 (n = 589) § - - -
Arterial hypertension (yes vs. no) 2.004 1.440–2.789 <0.0001
Uric acid (>5.7 vs. ≤5.7 mg/dL) 2.254 1.617–3.140 <0.0001
LDH (>267.5 vs. ≤267.5 U/L) 1.448 1.036–2.023 0.0301
HU-treated (yes vs. WW) 1.797 1.162–2.780 0.0085
Other MPN treatment (yes vs. WW) 1.645 1.095–2.471 0.0165

* Initial model for eGFR2 vs. eGFR1: arterial hypertension, uric acid, MPN duration, and HU-treated. Initial model for eGFR3 vs. eGFR1: diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, leukocytes, and uric acid; neutrophils, monocytes, LDH, CRP, MPN duration, HU-treated, RUX-treated, and other MPN treatment. Hyperlipidemia (n = 69) was not assessed in multiple regression analysis because of the low number of patients. § Initial model for eGFR3 vs. eGFR2: JAK2V617F mutation, diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, leukocytes, platelets, and uric acid; neutrophils, monocytes, LDH, CRP, HU-treated, RUX-treated, and other MPN treatment. Bolded values indicate significant odds ratios and significant p values.