Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 6;11(8):1047. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11081047

Table 3.

Reading task: Outcome measure results of study participant’s pre- and post-chiropractic intervention versus active control.

Intervention Significance
Chiropractic Intervention Control Intervention Group Effect p Value Group by Time Interaction p Value
Outcome + n Pre n Post n Pre n Post
Reading time M (SD) 25 4016.93 (1894.50) 23 3370.06 (1508.91) 23 3548.76 (1637.85) 24 3440.41 (1971.01) 0.034 0.035
Number of forward fixations M (SD) 25 2.37 (1.14) 23 2.13 (0.96) 23 2.24 (1.15) 24 2.18 (1.00) ^ ^
Forward fixation time M (SD) 25 970.94 (645.49) 23 894.16 (514.45) 23 854.42 (469.52) 24 885.23 (604.58) ^ ^
Number reverse fixations M (SD) 18 * 1.21 (0.45) 20 * 1.04 (0.21) 16 * 1.22 (0.46) 19 * 1.17 (0.59) ^ ^
Reverse fixation time M (SD) 18 * 867.15 (672.2) 20 * 755.39 (555.85) 16 * 678.89 (506.73) 19 * 727.23 (559.7) ^ ^
Forward saccade length M (SD) 25 407.61 (135.41) 23 400.86 (117.50) 23 398.41 (96.74) 24 392.77 (88.19) ^ ^
Reverse saccade length M (SD) 18 * 284.24 (280.78) 20 * 223.12 (150.09) 16 * 253.37 (191.97) 19 * 223.76 (142.95) ^ ^

Note: + = per sentence. n are participants able to calibrate, n * are participants who exhibited a reverse reading behaviour. Time is milliseconds and length in pixels. p value significance set at 0.05. ^ = unable to perform group effect or group by time analysis as data was not normally distributed after attempted data transformation to a normal distribution.