Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 18;13(16):4159. doi: 10.3390/cancers13164159

Table 4.

Results for diagnostics, treatment and palliative care.

Author and Year Cancer Type Outcomes Study Results (Proportion of Patients Received)
Imaging/Staging/Diagnostics
Anania et al., 2019 [17] Colorectal cancer (1) Colonoscopy
(2) CT
(3) MRI
(4) Ultrasound
(1) 57.7% * vs 78.4% *
(2) 24.4% vs. 82.4%; p < 0.01
(3) 4.4% vs. 62.7%; p < 0.01
(4) 15.6% vs. 23.5%; p = NS
Fernando et al., 2017 [20] Colorectal cancer (1) CT abdomen
(2) CT chest
(3) Colonography
(4) MRI
(5) FDG-PET CT
(6) X-ray chest
(7) Ultrasound
(8) col/sigmoidoscopy
(9) biopsy
(10) liver function tests
(11) Carcinoembryonic antigen
(1) 96.2% vs. 96.3%; p = 0.545
(2) 23.6% vs. 49.5%; p < 0.001
(3) 25.8% vs. 19.6%; p = 0.054
(4) 9.3% vs. 67.5%; p < 0.001
(5) 2.2% vs. 17.9%; p < 0.001
(6) 75.3% vs. 43.4% p < 0.001
(7) 5.5% vs. 6.1%; p = 0.467
(8) 85.7% vs. 89.3%; p = 0.127
(9) 81.9% vs. 88.2%; p = 0.025
(10) 23.6% vs. 29.8%; p = 0.068
(11) 79.1% vs. 78.2%; p = 0.446
Foucan et al., 2020 [37] Colon cancer CT scans 46.6% vs. 66.6%; p < 0.001
Freeman et al., 2015 [40] NSCLC Complete staging 67% vs. 91%; p < 0.001
Maurizi et al., 2017 [36] Rectal cancer (1) MRI,
(2) CEA testing
(3) colonoscopy
(4) CT
(5) Endoscopic rectal ultrasound
(6) Post-therapy preoperative restaging with MRI
(1) 23.33% vs. 51.43%; p = 0.010
(2) 46.67% vs. 65.71%; p = 0.061
(3) 86.67% vs. 85.71; p = 0.456
(4) 90.00% vs. 97.14%; p = 0.116
(5) 16.67% vs. 25.71%; p = 0.188
(6) 26.67% vs. 34.29%; p = 0.254
Richardson et al., 2016 [28] Rectal cancer (1) Colonoscopy (1) 95% vs. 100% (MDTM year 1) vs. 96% (MDTM year (2) p = 0.3828
Palmer et al., 2011 [27] Rectal cancer Preoperative local staging:
 (1) MRI exams
 (2) Endorectal ultrasonography
Preoperative distant staging
 (3) CT/MRI abdomen
 (4) Ultrasound abdomen
 (5) Chest CT or X-ray
(1) 89.9% * vs. 98.5% *
(2) 21.2% * vs 4.6% *
(3) 57.6% * vs. 75.4% *
(4) 52.5% * vs 40.0% *
(5) 100% * vs 100%*
Tamburini et al., 2018 [44] NSCLC Rate of complete preoperative evaluation 64% vs. 93% (p < 0.001).
Ye at al. 2012 [35] Colorectal cancer (1) CT examination performed before operation
(2) CT TNM staging performed before operation
(3) accurate TNM staging
(1) 30.3% vs. 55.7%; p < 0.001
(2) 41.1% vs. 81.3%; p < 0.001
(3) 45.9% vs. 64.0%; p = 0.044
Surgery
Anania et al., 2019 [17] Colorectal cancer Surgical type:
(1) Total mesorectal excision
(2) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision
(3) Open miles procedure
(4) Laparoscopic miles procedure
(1) 2.2% vs. 13.7%
(2) 88.9% vs. 68.6%
(3) 2.2% vs. 0%
(4) 6.7% vs 17.6
Boxer et al., 2011 [38] Lung cancer (1) Surgery
(2) Surgery stratified per stage
(1) 13% vs. 12%; p = 0.84
(2) NSCLC stages I +II (61% vs. 49%; p = 0.25)
NSCLC stage III (26% vs. 16%; p = 0.16)
NSCLC stage IV (0% vs. 2%; p = 0.13)
Brandão et al., 2020 [55] Breast cancer (1) Surgery (ever)
(2) Surgery type (first treatment)
(a) Total mastectomy
(b) Tumorectomy
(1) 80.6% vs. 82.2% (p = 0.858)
(2) (a) 94.9% vs. 89.8%
(b) 5.1% vs. 10.2
p = 0.257
Foucan et al., 2020 [37] Colon cancer Surgery 61.3% vs. 86.8%; p = 0.004
Freeman et al., 2015 [40] NSCLC Non-therapeutic surgical procedure 4% vs. 2%; p < 0.001
Lan et al., 2016 [23] Colorectal cancer Surgical resection of:
(1) primary tumor
(2) metastatic foci
(3) liver metastasis
(4) lung metastasis
(1) 88.5% vs 82.7%; p = 0.007
(2) 21.7% vs. 29.8%; p = 0.003
(3) 19.6% vs. 35.2%; p < 0.001
(4) 12.4% vs. 14.3%; p = 0.803
Muthukrishnan et al., 2020 [47] Lung cancer Surgery 17.0% vs. 16.4%
Palmer et al.* 2011 [27] Rectal cancer Types of surgery:
(1) no surgery
(2) explorative laparotomy
(3) resection of rectal cancer
(1) 4.0% vs. 7.7%
(2) 21.1% vs. 10.8%
(3) 74.7% vs. 81.5%
p = 0.024
Richardson et al., 2016 [28] Rectal cancer (1) Appropriate abdomino-peritoneal resections treatment
(2) Surgical type:
(a) Transanal (minimally) invasive surgery
(b) Low Anterior Resection
(c) Transanal Transabdominal Low Anterior Resection
(d) Abdominal-peritoneal resection
(1) 50% vs. 71% (MDTM year 1) vs. 78% (MDTM year 2); p = 0.191
(2) (a) 22% vs. 18% (MDTM year 1) vs. 9% (MDTM year 2)
 (b) 69% vs. 63% (MDTM year 1) vs. 40% (MDTM year 2)
 (c) 0% vs. 3% (MDTM year 1) vs. 7% (MDTM year 2)
 (d) 10% vs. 18% (MDTM year 1) vs. 43% (MDTM year 2);
p = 0.002
Swellengrebel et al., 2011 [31] Rectal cancer (1) Surgical type:
 (a) Low Anterior Resection
 (b) Hartmann procedure
 (c) Abdominal Perineal Resection
 (d) No surgery
(1) (a) 71% vs 41%
 (b) 9% vs 17%
 (c) 19% vs 40%
 (d) 1% vs 2%
Tamburini et al., 2018 [44] NSCLC (1) Surgical type:
(a) video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery
(b) exploratory thoracotomy
(1) (a) 48% vs. 9%; p = 0.001
 (b) 3% vs 1.8%; p = 0.31
Vaughan-Shaw et al., 2015 [32] Rectal cancer Surgical treatment:
(1) local excision
(2) less resection
(3) declined surgery
(1) 15.8% vs 83.3%
(2) 79.0% vs. 16.7%
(3) 5.3% vs. 0%
Wanis et al., 2017 [33] Colorectal cancer with liver metastasis Resection order MDTM group significantly more likely (p < 0.001) to undergo simultaneous resection of the primary colorectal tumor and liver metastases.
Wille-Jørgensen et al., 2013 [34] Rectal cancer Surgery 88% vs. 86%
Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy
Boxer et al., 2011 [38] Lung cancer (1) Radiotherapy
 (a) overall
 (b) stratified per NSCLC stage
 (c) stratified per SCLC stage
(2) Chemotherapy
 (a) overall
 (b) stratified per NSCLC stage
 (c) stratified per SCLC stage
(1) (a) 33% vs. 66%; p < 0.001.
 (b) stages I + II (17% vs. 54%; p < 0.001)
stage III (46% vs. 71%; p = 0.01)
stage IV (43% vs. 68%; p < 0.001)
 (c) limited stage (71% vs. 89%; p = 0.28), extensive stage (46% vs. 50%; p = 0.72).

(2) (a) 29% vs. 46%; p = 0.001.
 (b) stages I + II (15% vs. 18%; p = 0.67), stage III (39% vs. 43%; p = 0.72), stage IV (29% vs. 42%; p = 0.01),
 (c) SCLC limited stage (71% vs. 100%; p = 0.72), SCLC extensive stage (76% vs. 75%; p = 0.89).
Brandão et al., 2020 [55] Breast cancer (1) Radiotherapy (first treatment)
(2) Chemotherapy
(1) p = 0.175
(2) 91.8% vs. 96.3%; p = 0.237
Bydder et al., 2009 [39] NSCLC (1) Radical radiotherapy/Chemoradiotherapy
(2) Chemotherapy
(1) 6% vs. 10%; p = 0.318
(2) 29% vs. 42%; p = 0.141
Freeman et al., 2015 [40] NSCLC Radio and/or chemotherapy before tissue diagnosis 5% vs. 3%; p < 0.001
Lan et al., 2016 [23] Colorectal cancer (1) Chemotherapy
(2) Radiotherapy
(1) 75.9% vs. 83.8 %; p = 0.002
(2) 9.6% vs. 20.5 %; p < 0.001
MacDermid et al., 2009 [24] Colorectal cancer (1) Primary adjuvant chemotherapy
(a) Overall
 (b) Dukes B
 (c) Dukes C
(2) Preoperative radiotherapy
(1) (a) 13% vs. 31.3%; p < 0.001
(b)1.5% vs. 17.6%; p = 0.002
(c) 31.9% vs. 58.6%; p = 0.004(2) 24.4% vs. 32.5%; p = 0.462
Muthukrishnan et al., 2020 [47] Lung cancer (1) Radiation
(2) Chemotherapy
(3) Chemo-radiation.
(1) 17.9% vs. 20.0%
(2) 14.2% vs. 18.2%
(3) 28.3% vs. 32.7%
Palmer et al., * 2011 [27] Rectal cancer Preoperative treatments:
(1) No treatment
(2) Short radiotherapy
(3) Long radiotherapy
(4) Radio-chemotherapy
(5) Chemotherapy
(6) Unknown
(1) 42.4% vs. 21.5%
(2) 41.4% vs. 13.8%
(3) 5.1% vs. 30.8%
(4) 9.1% vs. 29.2%
(5) 1.0% vs 1.5%
(6) 1.0% vs. 3.1%
Wanis et al., 2017 [33] Colorectal cancer with liver metastasis Chemotherapy NS
Wille-Jørgensen et al., 2013 [34] Rectal cancer Preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy 19% vs. 25%
Ye et al., 2012 [35] Colorectal cancer (1) Adjuvant chemotherapy
(a) Overall
(b) stage I
(c) stage IIA
(d) stage IIB
(e) stage IIIA
(f) stage IIIB
(g) stage IIIC
(h) stage IV

(2) Adjuvant radiotherapy
(1) (a) 82.8%* vs. 49.3% *; p < 0.001
(b) 64.4%* vs 0% *; p < 0.001
(c) 82.2%* vs. 12.2% *; p < 0.001
(d) 80.0%* vs. 100% *; p = 0.183
(e) 84.6%* vs. 90.9%; p = 0.577
(f) 93.0% * vs. 91.1% *; p = 0.728
(g) 93.1% * vs. 86.1% *; p = 616
(h) 83.3% * vs. 88.4% *; p = 0.750

2) 0.3% * vs. 10.1% *; p < 0.001
Palliative Care and Hospice Referral
Boxer et al., 2011 [38] Lung cancer Referral to palliative care 53% vs 66%; p < 0.001
Bydder et al., 2009 [39] NSCLC (1) Palliative radiotherapy only
(2) Palliative care only
(1) 35% vs. 25%; p = 0.152
(2) 29% vs. 23%; p = 0.204
Freeman et al., 2015 [40] NSCLC Palliative or hospice care 4% vs. 9%; p < 0.001
MacDermid et al., 2009 [24] Colorectal cancer Palliative chemotherapy 32.5% vs. 44%; p = 0.431
Muthukrishnan et al., 2020 [47] Lung cancer Hospice referral 22.6% vs. 12.7%
Stone et al., 2018 [43] Lung cancer Referral to palliative care 78.0% vs. 85.3%; p = 0.06
Other
Anania et al., 2019 [17] Colorectal cancer Neo-adjuvant therapy The MDTM cohort showed a significantly higher use of neo-adjuvant therapy (22.2% vs. 56.9%; p < 0.01).
Brandão et al., 2020 [55] Breast cancer Endocrine therapy (first treatment) p = 0.888
Bydder et al., 2009 [39] NSCLC ‘Active’ treatment 35% vs. 52%; p = 0.288
Foucan et al., 2020 [37] Colon cancer Treatment type (surgery and chemotherapy):
(1) Overall
(2) Stratified per stage:
 (a) Stage I
 (b) Stage II
 (c) Stage III
 (d) Stage IV
(1) NS
(2) (a) p = 1.00
 (b) 0.869
 (c) p = 0.042
 (d) p < 0.001
Maurizi et al., 2017 [36] Rectal cancer Neoadjuvant therapy 33.33% vs. 42.86%; p = 0.216
Tsai et al., 2020 [56] Breast cancer Treatment combinations p = 0.211

Results, if available, comparing patients in MDTM group and non-MDTM group, are shown as (‘results non-MDTM group’ vs. ‘results MDTM group’, p-value). MDTM = multidisciplinary team meeting, NSCLC = non-small cell lung cancer SCLC = small cell lung cancer. * = percentages where calculated by the authors (L.K. and H.W.). P-values < 0.05 were considered significant, annotated in bold.