Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 19;11(8):429–448. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v11.i8.429

Table 2.

Reviews of antipsychotic augmentation strategies in clozapine-resistant schizophrenia1

Ref.
Type of review
Details
Effect on positive or psychotic symptoms
Effect on negative or depressive symptoms
Wagner et al[2], 2019 Systematic review 14 meta-analyses of FGA and SGA augmentation of clozapine. Some evidence of benefits based on low-quality studies (SIGN grade B).
Roerig et al[8], 2019 Systematic review 4 meta-analyses and 1 naturalistic study of FGA and SGA augmentation of clozapine. No benefits of antipsychotics when high-quality RCTs were considered.
Bartoli et al[22], 2019 Meta-analysis 12 RCTs of SGA augmentation of clozapine-risperidone (n = 5) and aripiprazole (n = 3). No difference between SGA augmentation and placebo in improving positive symptoms. A small benefit of SGA augmentation for negative and depressive symptoms.
Siskind et al[23], 2018 Meta-analysis 19 RCTs of FGA and SGA augmentation of clozapine-aripiprazole (n = 7), risperidone (n = 3), and amisulpiride (n = 2). Evidence for benefit with aripiprazole, but effects were lost when low-quality studies were excluded.
Correll et al[24], 2017 Meta-analysis Meta-analysis of 29 previous meta-analyses of antipsychotic combinations-5 clozapine combinations examined. Clozapine combinations no different from clozapine monotherapy for positive symptoms. Clozapine combinations no different from clozapine monotherapy for negative symptoms.
Galling et al[25], 2017 Meta-analysis 20 RCTs of FGA and SGA augmentation of clozapine-risperidone (n = 6) and aripiprazole (n = 6). No evidence for additional benefits of augmentation in double-blind, high-quality RCTs. Improvement in negative symptoms with aripiprazole augmentation. No effect of augmentation on depressive symptoms.
Ortiz-Orendain et al[26], 2017 Meta-analysis 31 RCTs and quasi-RCTs of augmentation with SGAs (n = 26) and FGAs (n = 5) including clozapine augmentation. Low-quality evidence that augmentation improves global clinical response. No specific effects on positive symptoms. No effect of augmentation on negative symptoms.
Barber et al[27], 2017 Meta-analysis 5 RCTs of clozapine augmentation with SGAs or haloperidol. Low-quality evidence that augmentation may improve global clinical response. Effects on positive symptoms not clear. Effects on negative symptoms not clear.
Jiménez-Cornejo et al[28], 2016 Meta-analysis 17 prior meta-analyses and reviews of FGA and SGA augmentation (62 studies) of clozapine. Little evidence that augmentation improves clinical response (> 20% reduction in PANSS/BPRS scores).
Taylor et al[29], 2012 Meta-analysis 14 RCTs of FGA and SGA augmentation of clozapine. A small benefit in overall symptom reduction with augmentation.
Sommer et al[30], 2012 Meta-analysis 10 RCTs of FGA and SGA augmentation of clozapine. One RCT showed that sulpiride augmentation led to overall symptom reduction. No specific effects on positive symptoms. No specific effects on negative symptoms.
Porcelli et al[31], 2012 Systematic review and meta-analysis Systematic review of 25 studies of SGA augmentation of clozapine - risperidone (11 trials) and aripiprazole (6 trials). Meta-analysis of 5 RCTs of risperidone augmentation of clozapine. Low quality evidence indicated benefits for aripiprazole and amisulpiride augmentation. No benefit of risperidone augmentation. Some benefit of aripiprazole in reducing negative symptoms from 1 RCT.
1

Several other systematic reviews[9,12,14,32,33] and meta-analyses[17,34-37] have been unable to find significant benefits, while others have reported modest benefits for antipsychotic augmentation of clozapine[38-44].

BPRS: Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; FGA: First-generation antipsychotic; RCT: Randomized controlled trial; PANSS: Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale; SGA: Second-generation antipsychotic; SIGN: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network.