Table 4.
ECT
| |||
Ref.
|
Study/review
|
Details
|
Results
|
Masoudzadeh et al[56], 2007 | Controlled trial, (non-randomized, non-blinded) | 18 patients with TRS; 3 groups of clozapine-ECT treatment, only clozapine and only ECT treatment (n = 6 each) | Significant differences between the clozapine- ECT combination and monotherapy groups in reduction of PANSS scores. |
Petrides et al[54], 2015 | Single-blind cross-over RCT | 39 patients with TRS randomized to clozapine-ECT (n = 20) and clozapine only treatment (n = 19) | Significantly greater response on BPRS psychosis & CGI scores in the clozapine-ECT combination group. |
Melzer-Ribeiro et al[55], 2017 | Single-blind sham-controlled RCT | 23 patients with CRS randomized to treatment with clozapine-ECT (n = 13) and clozapine-sham ECT (n = 10) | No significant differences between the groups on PANSS total and positive symptom scores and CGI scores. |
Kupchik et al[57], 2000 | Systematic review | Case reports of 36 patients with TRS and clozapine non-responders | 67% of the patients on the clozapine-ECT combination showed good response. |
Braga et al[58], 2005 | Systematic review | 12 case reports or chart reviews of patients with TRS and clozapine non-responders | The clozapine-ECT combination was efficacious. |
Havaki-Kontaxaki et al[59], 2006 | Systematic review | One open trial and 6 case studies of patients with CRS | 73% patients on the clozapine-ECT combination showed marked improvement. |
Pompili et al[60], 2013 | Systematic review | 31 studies examining indications for ECT in schizophrenia | The clozapine-ECT combination was efficacious in patients resistant to medications. |
Grover et al[61], 2015 | Systematic review | 40 studies, mainly case reports of patients with CRS | Short-term response rates of the clozapine-ECT combination varied from 37%-100%. |
Lally et al[62], 2016 | Systematic review and meta-analysis | Pooled analysis of patients with TRS treated with clozapine and ECT based on 4 open trials, 2 controlled trials (1 RCT)1, 2 chart reviews, 6 case series, and 15 case reports | Pooled response rate with the clozapine-ECT combination was 54% on meta-analysis. Systematic review showed 76% overall response rate with clozapine-ECT treatment and a relapse rate of 32%. |
Manubens et al[63], 2016 | Systematic review and meta-analysis | 6 systematic reviews of ECT in TRS including 6 controlled trials of the clozapine-ECT combination in clozapine non-responders (1 RCT)1 | Modest effect of ECT in augmenting clozapine response with low certainty of evidence. |
Ahmed et al[64], 2017 | Systematic review and meta-analysis | 9 studies of the clozapine-ECT combination in TRS including 2 controlled trials (1 RCT)1, 3 open trials, and 4 case series/chart-reviews vs 9 studies of ECT-non-clozapine antipsychotic combination | The ECT-clozapine combination was significantly better than the ECT-non-clozapine antipsychotic combinations in reducing positive symptoms on the PANSS and the BPRS. |
Wang et al[52], 2018 | Meta-analysis | 18 RCTs of clozapine augmentation in CRS (17 from China and 1 from the United States1) | Adjunctive ECT was superior to clozapine monotherapy in reducing positive symptoms after 1–2 wk but with moderate effect size. |
rTMS | |||
Wagner et al[66], 2020 | Meta-analysis | Pooled data from 10 RCTs for 131 patients with persistent positive and negative symptoms being treated with clozapine | No differences between active and sham rTMS in improving clinical response and reducing PANSS scores. No benefit of rTMS augmentation for patients with persistent symptoms on clozapine. |
The RCT from United States is by Petrides et al[54].
BPRS: Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; CGI: Clinical Global Impression scale; CRS: Clozapine-resistant schizophrenia; ECT: Electroconvulsive therapy; PANSS: Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale; RCT: Randomized controlled trial; rTMS: Recurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation; TRS: Treatment resistant schizophrenia.