Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 17;10(8):1907. doi: 10.3390/foods10081907

Table 2.

List of studies highlighting applications of microsatellites in the characterization of olive genetic resources.

Objective Cultivars or
Accessions
Region No. of SSRs Ho He Na PIC Reference Key Remarks
Characterization and Identification of Olive Cultivars 19 Slovenia, Italy, France, Spain 14 (DCA-1,3,4,5,7,8,9,10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17) 0.263–1.000 NA 3–12 NA [60] Identification key of 19 olive varieties
Characterization and Identification of Olive Cultivars 87 Iran 16 (DCA 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 11, 10, GAPU101, 103A, 89, 71B, 72, 90) NA NA NA 0.620–0.950 [92] Intra-cultivar variation, cultivar denominations and origin investigated using SSRs
Characterization of Autochthonous Olives 44 Croatia 16 (UDO-08, 12, 19, 24, 28, 31, 39, 43, DCA3, 8, 9, 10, 14, 16, EMO2, 3) 0.273–0.932 0.499–0.910 5–20 NA [93] SSR-based varietal discrimination achieved
Germplasm Characterization 154 Tuscany 12 (UDO-04, 06, 09, 11, 12, 17, 19, 24, 27, 31, SIU06, 08) 0.278–0.722 0.428–0.855 3–10 NA [94] Homonyms and synonyms detected
Database Development and Cultivar Identification 17 Mediterranean Basin 08 (DCA3, 4, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15) NA NA 3–12 NA [57] Standardization of SSR set for olive cultivar studies
Characterization and Identification of Olive Cultivars 18 Bologna, Italy 17 (DCA3,4,5,7,9,13,14,15,16,17,18, EMO90, GAPU59,101,103, UDO-24, 43) 0.500–1.000 0.431–0.841 4–10 NA [95] Synonyms identified and diversity in germplasm revealed
Characterization of Olive Cultivars 20 Tunisia 10 (GAPU59, 71A, 71B, 103A, UDO-03, 12, 28, 39, DCA9, 18) 0.300–0.950 0.562–0.801 3–6 NA [96] Cultivars broadly grouped by their end use and phenotypes
Characterization of Olive Cultivars 38 Southern Marmara region, Turkey 10 (GAPU103A, 101, UDO-06, 07, 09, 11, 12, 14, 15, 35) NA NA 2–5 NA [97] Cultivar Gemlik revealed as major olive cultivar in the region
Characterization of Olive Cultivars 51 Iran 13 (DCA3,9,16,18,11,15, UDO-43, 11, 19, 24, GAPU59, 71B, 101) 0.000–1.000 0.000–0.800 1–8 0.000–0.750 [98] Synonyms, homonyms and intra-cultivar polymorphisms detected
Characterization and Diversity Analysis 47 Southern Italy 6 (DCA3, 4, 16, 17, UDO-31, GAPU 47) 0.700–0.890 NA 11–17 0.830–0.870 [99] Genetic distinctness of accessions from Campania region established
Characterization of Olive cultivars 10 Turkey 7 (DCA-4, 9, 11, 16, 17, GAPU-89, UDO-14) NA NA 3–6 NA [100] Misnamings among cultivars identified
Cultivar Identification Using SSR 53 Australia 7 (9, 3, 16, 18, 5, EMO90, 30) 0.490–0.980 0.480–0.840 7–12 0.467–0.813 [101] Samples grouped into distinct genotypes
Characterization of Olive Germplasm 561 Marrakech (OWGB collection) 17 (DCA1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 14, 15, 18, UDO-36, GAPU59, 71A, 71B, EMO03, 90,PA(ATT)2*) 0.490–0.928 0.454–0.876 5–32 0.403–0.864 [102] Construction of two core collections
Cultivar Characterization and Diversity Analysis 26 Algeria 11 (DCA9, 18, GAPU59, 71A, 71B, 101, 103A, UDO-12, 43, 28, 39) 0.135–0.889 0.070–0.510 6–21 NA [103] SSR genotyping allowed unambiguous identification of all the cultivars
Cultivar characterization and Diversity Analysis 39 Colombia 10 (DCA3, 5, 9, 16, 17, 18, UDO-43, GAPU101, 103A, EMO90) 0.250–1.000 0.312–0.909 3–15 0.282–0.876 [104] Synonyms, homonyms identified and 19 genetic profiles discriminated

(Na) Average number of alleles per locus. (Ho) Observed heterozygosity. (He) Expected heterozygosity or gene diversity. (PIC) Polymorphic information content.