Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 27;19(8):e06821. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6821
Commodity Region/a Residue levels observed in the supervised residue trials (mg/kg) Comments/Source Calculated MRL (mg/kg) HRb (mg/kg) STMRc (mg/kg) CFd
Oil palm fruits CO 3 × < 0.010; 0.011; 0.018 Residue trials on oil palm fruits performed with six instead of five applications. This is considered acceptable based on 25% tolerance (and considering that the 1st application is expected to have less impact on the final residue) Austria (2021). 0.03 0.018 0.010 n/a
Mangoes BR Mo: 1.66; 2.16; 2.31; 2.54 Residue trials on mangoes compliant with GAP (Foliar spray and post‐harvest spray). MRL proposal based on the mean residue + 4 × SD (EFSA, 2015)7 4.0 2.54 2.24 n/a
BR Mo: 1.67; 1.93; 2.11; 2.67 Residue trials on mangoes compliant with GAP (Foliar spray and post‐harvest dip). MRL proposal based on the mean residue + 4 × SD (EFSA, 2015)7 4.0 2.67 2.02 n/a

MRL: maximum residue level; GAP: Good Agricultural Practice; Mo: monitoring; RA: risk assessment.

*

Indicates that the MRL is proposed at the limit of quantification.

a

NEU: Outdoor trials conducted in northern Europe, SEU: Outdoor trials conducted in southern Europe, EU: indoor EU trials or Country code: if non‐EU trials. CO: Columbia; BR. Brazil.

b

Highest residue. The highest residue for risk assessment refers to the whole commodity and not to the edible portion.

c

Supervised trials median residue. The median residue for risk assessment refers to the whole commodity and not to the edible portion.

d

Conversion factor to recalculate residues according to the residue definition for monitoring to the residue definition for risk assessment.