Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 27;19(8):e06821. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6821
Processed commodity Number of valid studiesa Processing Factor (PF) CFP b Comment/Source
Individual values Median PF
Oil palm fruit, mesocarp meal 2 0.083, 2.12 1.5 1 Tentativec
Austria (2021)
Oil palm fruit, mesocarp oil 2 1.43, 2.84 2.1 1
Oil palm fruit, kernel meal 2 0.23, 0.28 0.3 1
Oil palm fruit, kernel oil 2 0.23, 0.28 0.3 1
Mango, peeled (whole fruit to pulpd) at day of dip post‐harvest treatment 4 0.005; 0.01; 0.036; 0.036 0.02 1 Residues in the pulp following the foliar applications at PHI of 7 where always < LOQ of 0.01 mg/kg (Austria, 2021)
Mango, peeled (whole fruit to pulpd) at day of spray post‐harvest treatment 4 0.004; 0.006; 0.017; 0.019 0.01 1
Mango, peeled (whole fruit to pulpd) 21 days after dip post‐harvest treatment 4 0.01; 0.013; 0.017; 0.036 0.02 1
Mango, peeled (whole fruit to pulpd) 21 days after spray post‐harvest treatment 4 0.008; 0.01; 0.022; 0.03 0.02 1
Mango, peeled (whole fruit to pulpd) 42 days after dip post‐harvest treatment 4 0.0037; 0.011; 0.023; 0.027 0.02 1
Mango, peeled (whole fruit to pulpd) 42 days after spray post‐harvest treatment 4 0.007; 0.01; 0.0144; 0.024; 0.01 1

PF: processing factor.

a

Studies with residues in the RAC at or close to the LOQ were disregarded (unless concentration may occur).

b

Conversion factor for risk assessment in the processed commodity is not applicable.

c

A tentative PF is derived based on a limited data set.

d

The individual peeling factors represent a mean of two measurements of residues ranging from the LOQ of 0.01 mg/kg up to 0.07 mg/kg.