Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 21;18(16):8824. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168824

Table 1.

Description of the included studies: country, study design, participants’ demographics, setting and study aim.

Author,
Year
Country Study Design Participants’ Demographics Setting Study Aim
No. of Participants (n) Mean Age, Years (SD)
[Range]
Female
Acurcio et al. [31],
2009
Brazil Epidemiological cross-sectional 377 72.4
(61–102)
69.2% Home visits. To examine factors associated with therapeutic regimen complexity of drug prescriptions for elderly people.
Bazargan et al. [32],
2017
USA Cross-sectional study 400 73.5 (7)
(65–94)
65% Sixteen predominantly African-American churches in SPA6 of Los Angeles County. To examine the association between adherence to drug regimens and a spectrum of medication-related factors, including polypharmacy, medication regimen complexity, use of PIMs, knowledge about their therapeutic purpose and instructions of proper medication use.
Chang et al. [33],
2017
Australia Retrospective cohort study 100 82 (9.15) 60% General medical units of a tertiary care hospital. To assess the changes in the MRCI before and after hospitalisation. To examine the prevalence of prescribing PIMs at the time of hospital discharge, using the 2015 Beers Criteria.
Elliot [34],
2012
Australia Cohort study 205 81.3 (8.0) 58% Two acute general medicine wards and two subacute aged care wards at a major metropolitan public hospital. To explore the feasibility of incorporating medication regimen simplifications into routine clinical pharmacists’ care for older hospital inpatients, and to identify barriers to regimen simplification.
Elliot et al. [10],
2011
Australia Cohort study 186
Acute wards: 115
Subacute wards: 71
Acute wards: 79
(77–80)
Subacute wards: 81
(80–83)
Acute wards: 59%
Subacute wards: 55%
Two acute general medicine wards and two subacute aged care wards at a large public hospital. To investigate the impact of hospitalisation on the complexity of older patients’ medication regimens, and to determine whether discharge medication regimens could be simplified.
Elliot et al. [12],
2013
Australia Cohort study 391
Pre-intervention: 186
Intervention: 205
Pre-intervention: 79.7 (8.2)
Intervention: 81.3 (8.0)
57.8%
Pre-intervention: 57.5%
Intervention: 58.%
Two acute general medicine wards and two subacute aged care wards at a major metropolitan public hospital. To investigate the impact of pharmacists’ medication reviews, together with an educational intervention targeting inpatient clinical pharmacists and junior medical officers on the increase in medication regimen complexity during hospitalisation.
Kroenke et al. [35],
1990
USA Prospective controlled trial 79
Intervention: 38
Control: 41
Intervention: 72.3
Control: 71.4
40.5%
Intervention: 39.5%
Control: 41.5%
Internal Medicine Clinic at Brooke Army Medical Center. To determine the effectiveness of specific feedback to prescribing physicians in reducing polypharmacy in elderly outpatients.
Lakey et al. [36],
2009
USA Cross-sectional 109 85.9 (5.1)
(73–98)
79.8% Continuing care retirement community in Seattle. To assess older adults’ current use of, knowledge of and preferences for medication management tools and supports.
Lindquist et al. [37],
2014
USA Cross-sectional 200 79.6 (6.4)
(70–100)
58% Home visits after discharge from Northwestern Memorial Hospital. To determine whether seniors consolidate their home medications or if there is evidence of unnecessary regimen complexity.
Linnebur et al. [38],
2014
USA Retrospective cross-sectional 200
CA: 100
CO: 100
CA: 74.3 (7.4)
CO: 79.7 (6.1)
78.5%
CA: 76%
CO: 81%
Ambulatory clinics at the University of CA and the University of CO. To evaluate the entire medication regimen of older adults with depression, and determine potential targets to simplify the regimen and improve adherence.
Mansur et al. [39],
2012
Israel Cohort study 212 81.1 (7.3)
(66–103)
61.8% Acute Geriatric Ward at the Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center. To test the convergent, discriminant and predictive validity of the MRCI in older hospitalised patients with varying functional and cognitive levels.
Moczygemba et al. [40],
2012
USA Quasi-experimental 120
Intervention: 60
Control: 60
Intervention: 71.2 (7.5)
Control: 73.9 (8.0)
60%
Intervention: 48.3%
Control: 71.7%
Telephone consultation. To determine the impact of telephone MTM on MHRPs, medication adherence and total drug costs for Medicare Part D participants.
Pinto et al. [41],
2016
Brazil Cross-sectional 227 71.4 70.9% Two PHUs in the municipality of Belo Horizonte. To evaluate the level of understanding of pharmacotherapy and the associated factors amongst older people in two PHUs.
Pouranayatihosseinabad et al. [42], 2018 Australia Retrospective observational study 285 85.5 (7.7) 68% Residential ACFs. To investigate the impact of RMMRs on simplifying medication regimen complexity in Australian ACF residents using the MRCI.
Sevilla-Sánchez et al. [43],
2017
Spain Prospective cross-sectional study 235 86.80 (5.37) 65.50% AGU in a second-level hospital. To determine the prevalence of PIMs among patients with advanced chronic conditions and palliative care needs, and to analyse the associated risk factors and resulting clinical consequences.
Wimmer et al. [44],
2014
Australia Prospective cohort 163
Readmitted: 99
Not readmitted: 64
Readmitted: 84.9 (6.2)
Not readmitted: 85.6 (6.74)
72.4%
Readmitted: 68.7%
Not readmitted: 78.1%
GEM unit of a public hospital in Adelaide. To investigate the association between discharge medication regimen complexity and unplanned re-hospitalisation over 12 months.
Wimmer et al. [22],
2014
Australia Prospective cohort 163
DD home: 87
DD NCS: 76
85.2 (6.4)
(71–101)
DD home: 84.6 (6.9)
DD NCS: 85.8 (5.8)
72.4%
DD home: 68.7%
DD NCS: 77.6%
GEM unit at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital. To investigate the association between polypharmacy and medication regimen complexity with hospital discharge destination among older people.

ACFs, aged care facilities; AGU, acute care geriatric unit; CA, California San Diego; CO, Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus; DD, discharge destination; GEM, geriatric evaluation and management; MHRP, medication- and health-related problems; MRCI, medication regimen complexity index; MTM, medication therapy management; NCS, non-community setting; PHUs, primary health care units; RMMRs, residential medication management reviews; and SPA6, Service Planning Area 6.