Table 6.
ANOVA and Tuckey tests for difference in the ROS answers among the treatments.
| ANOVA | Tuckey Test Binary Comparisons | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor | Df | Sum Sq | Mean Sq | F Value | Pr (>F) | Test | diff | lwr | upr | p adj |
| Job | 3 | 7.78 | 2.59 | 13.63 | 0.00 *** | SG vs. WG | 0.53 | 0.12 | 0.94 | 0.00 ** |
| Sports categories | 3 | 1.89 | 0.63 | 3.31 | 0.02 * | SF vs. WF | 0.47 | 0.06 | 0.88 | 0.01 * |
| Vehicle ownership | 2 | 1.77 | 0.89 | 4.65 | 0.01 * | SW vs. WW | 0.32 | −0.09 | 0.74 | 0.23 |
| Native | 2 | 2.27 | 1.14 | 5.97 | 0.00 ** | SF vs. SG | 0.18 | −0.24 | 0.59 | 0.86 |
| Frequency to nature | 3 | 13.66 | 4.55 | 23.94 | 0.00 *** | SW vs. SG | −0.02 | −0.43 | 0.39 | 1.00 |
| Age | 1 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 3.65 | 0.06 • | SW vs. SF | −0.20 | −0.61 | 0.22 | 0.79 |
| Gender | 1 | 7.24 | 7.24 | 38.07 | 0.00 *** | WF vs. WG | 0.24 | −0.17 | 0.65 | 0.60 |
| Season | 2 | 10.15 | 10.15 | 53.36 | 0.00 *** | WW vs. WG | 0.19 | −0.23 | 0.60 | 0.83 |
| Landscape | 2 | 1.74 | 0.87 | 4.58 | 0.01 * | WW vs. WF | −0.05 | −0.46 | 0.36 | 1.00 |
| Residuals | 191 | 36.33 | 0.19 | |||||||
| Total | 5 | 12.06 | 2.41 | 6.88 | 0.00 *** | |||||
| Residuals | 204 | 71.46 | 0.35 | |||||||
Note: *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, • p < 0.1.