Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 30;30(1):147–152. doi: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_63_21

Table 3.

Empathy scores: Specialty wise, in different years of medical education

Empathy

Year Specialty choice n Mean SD Minimum-maximum Mean rank Kruskal–Wallis Test
First Person oriented 182 91.38 15.066 35-136 253.80 χ2=4.857
Technology oriented 193 89.60 14.514 44-139 242.38 df=2
Undecided/others 106 86.25 9.776 40-116 216.51 Asymptotic significance=0.088
Second Patient oriented 162 89.13 13.038 44-135 210.48 χ2=7.239
Technology oriented 176 90.22 14.794 46-134 220.67 df=2
Undecided/others 78 85.37 8.816 63-115 176.92 Asymptotic significance=0.027
Third Patient oriented 171 88.32 11.260 64-122 197.19 χ2=2.172
Technology oriented 177 91.15 15.493 33-137 215.96 df=2
Undecided/others 64 90.14 15.351 50-133 205.21 Asymptotic significance=0.338
Fourth Patient oriented 143 90.85 11.893 64-137 186.08 χ2=1.903
Technology oriented 167 88.90 10.754 48-122 173.35 df=2
Undecided/others 44 87.95 14.664 53-125 165.35 Asymptotic significance=0.386

Only in second year, empathy significantly varied, according to choice of specialty. SD – Standard deviation; Df – Degree of freedom