Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 3;1(7):987–997. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.1c00179

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Analysis of kRISC in DABNA. (a) Contributions by vibrational modes with strong resonance enhancements, namely ν106, ν116, and ν118. The ΔEST values at which Inline graphic become maxima are marked as vertical lines. (b) Contributions by each vibrational mode to kSV at the vertically marked energies in a. The contribution is further partitioned into spin-manifold components according to eq 4. (c) Convergence profiles of the sum-over-electronic-states expansion for each mode in the triplet manifold. Similar profiles in the singlet manifold are provided in Figure S1. Here, the excited state with a dominant contribution (T3) can be easily identified as marked with gray spheres. Convergence was reached with 20 excited states as denoted with dashed lines and stars. The T1 energy was used as the zero energy reference. (d) Natural transition orbital pairs from the ω*B97X calculations at the S1 geometry. Hole (red) and particle (blue) wave functions are represented by frontier orbitals with the largest weights, shown in parentheses. The S1 and the T1 energies are from the SCS-CC2 level calculations. (e) Nonadiabatic T1–T3 and S1–S6 coupling vectors responsible for RISC.