Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 19;9(3):42. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence9030042

Table 3.

Internal consistency reliability of the LEAS, computerized LEAS and children’s version of the LEAS (LEAS-C; (Barchard et al. 2011)).

Citation Participants Number of Items Internal Consistency
LEAS
Bydlowski et al. (2002) 121 healthy French adults 20 0.75
Lane et al. (1990) 40 undergraduates 20 0.81
Lane et al. (1995) 51 medical students 20 0.82
Lane et al. (2000b) 379 healthy community members 20 0.88
Ciarrochi et al. (2005) 316 healthy adults 16 0.80
Richard Lane (unpublished data) 375 healthy adult volunteers 10: Part A
10: Part B
0.78
0.79
Barchard and Hakstian (2004)
Subic-Wrana et al. (2014)
176 undergraduates
380 healthy adult volunteers
5
4
0.58
0.61
Computer-Administered LEAS
Barchard et al. (2010a) 66 undergraduates 20 0.88
Barchard et al. (2010b) 268 undergraduates 20 0.84
LEAS-C
Bajgar et al. (2005) 51 children (aged 10–11) 12 0.66
Agnoli et al. (2019) 488 children (aged 8–12) 12 0.68
Veirman et al. (2016) 574 children (ages 8–16) 6 0.74
Veirman et al. (2011) 381 children (aged 10–17) 12 0.76