Table 4.
Inter-rater reliability of the LEAS and LEAS-C (Barchard et al. 2011).
| Citation | Participants | Number of Items | Inter-Rater Reliability |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEAS | |||
| Lane et al. (1990) | 40 undergraduates | 20 | 0.81 |
| Wrana et al. (1998) | 331 German medical students | 20 | 0.81 |
| Noland et al. (2005) | 66 undergraduates | 20 | 0.97 |
| Lane et al. (1995) | 51 medical students | 20 | 0.97 |
| Novick-Kline et al. (2005) | 293 undergraduates | 20 | 0.95 |
| Barchard (2009) | 48 undergraduates | 20 | 18 raters: pairs ranged 0.72–0.99 (mean 0.94) |
| Ciarrochi et al. (2005) | 316 healthy adults, regular instructions | 8 | 0.92 |
| Ciarrochi et al. (2005) | 316 healthy adults, half in control condition and half in high motivation condition | 8 | 0.96 |
| Barchard and Hakstian (2004) | 176 undergraduates | 5 | 0.96 |
| Lane et al. (2000b) | 379 healthy community members | 5 | 0.96 |
| LEAS-C | |||
| Bajgar et al. (2005) | 51 children (aged 10–11) | 12 | 0.89 |
| Agnoli et al. (2019) | 488 children (aged 8–12) | 12 | 0.71–0.87 |
| Veirman et al. (2016) | 574 children (aged 8–16) | 6 | 0.92–0.95 |