Table 2.
Hazard Ratios for incident HF event according to DASH diet score
A. All | ||||
Model | Q1 (Score 8–20) | Q2 (Score 21–23) | Q3 (Score 24–27) | Q4 (Score 28–40) |
N (events) | 4,203 (200) | 4,559 (179) | 5,764 (224) | 4,330 (164) |
Event Rate, person-years | 53/10,000 | 43/10,000 | 41/10,000 | 40/10,000 |
1* | 1.00 (ref) | 0.68 (0.55,0.83) | 0.62 (0.51,0.75) | 0.55 (0.45,0.68) |
2† | 1.00 (ref) | 0.73 (0.59,0.89) | 0.75 (0.61,0.91) | 0.70 (0.57,0.88) |
3‡ | 1.00 (ref) | 0.69 (0.56,0.85) | 0.71 (0.58,0.87) | 0.73 (0.58,0.92) |
B. Age<65 | ||||
Model | Q1 (Score 8–20) | Q2 (Score 21–23) | Q3 (Score 24–27) | Q4 (Score 28–40) |
N (events) | 2,624 (82) | 2,427 (45) | 2,865 (44) | 1,927 (22) |
Event Rate, person-years | 35/10,000 | 20/10,000 | 16/10,000 | 12/10,000 |
1* | 1.00 (ref) | 0.54 (0.38,0.78) | 0.43 (0.30,0.62) | 0.31 (0.19,0.49) |
2† | 1.00 (ref) | 0.60 (0.41,0.86) | 0.53 (0.36,0.77) | 0.42 (0.26,0.67) |
3‡ | 1.00 (ref) | 0.56 (0.39,0.81) | 0.54 (0.37,0.79) | 0.48 (0.30,0.78) |
C. Age 65–74 | ||||
Model | Q1 (Score 8–20) | Q2 (Score 21–23) | Q3 (Score 24–27) | Q4 (Score 28–40) |
N (events) | 1,145 (7 ) | 1,457 (80) | 1,941 (77) | 1,579 (62) |
Event Rate, person-years | 77/10,000 | 60/10,000 | 41/10,000 | 40/10,000 |
1* | 1.00 (ref) | 0.78 (0.57,1.07) | 0.54 (0.39,0.74) | 0.51 (0.37,0.72) |
2† | 1.00 (ref) | 0.87 (0.63,1.18) | 0.65 (0.48,0.90) | 0.67 (0.48,0.94) |
3‡ | 1.00 (ref) | 0.79 (0.58,1.08) | 0.57 (0.42,0.79) | 0.65 (0.46,0.92) |
D. Age≥ 75 | ||||
Model | Q1 (Score 8–20) | Q2 (Score 21–23) | Q3 (Score 24–27) | Q4 (Score 28–40) |
N (events) | 434 (39) | 675 (54) | 958 (103) | 824 (80) |
Event Rate, person-years | 113/10,000 | 98/10,000 | 126/10,000 | 113/10,000 |
1* | 1.00 (ref) | 0.83 (0.55,1.25) | 1.07 (0.74,1.55) | 0.96 (0.66,1.42) |
2† | 1.00 (ref) | 0.81 (0.54,1.23) | 1.19 (0.82,1.72) | 1.13 (0.77,1.66) |
3‡ | 1.00 (ref) | 0.81 (0.54,1.24) | 1.21 (0.83,1.76) | 1.12 (0.75,1.66) |
Model 1 adjusts for total energy intake, age, sex, and race
Model 2 adjusts for Model 1 plus other socio-demographic factors such as geographic region, annual family income (< vs. ≥ $20,000/year), educational achievement (< vs. ≥ high school diploma), health insurance, marital status, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity
Model 3 adjusts for Model 2 plus potentially-mediating physiologic parameters such as systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, body mass index, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglycerides, estimated glomerular filtration rate, natural log-transformed C-reactive protein, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio, diabetes, history of coronary heart disease, history of atrial fibrillation, and left ventricular hypertrophy