Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 12;1(8):1275–1287. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.1c00201

Table 2. Sensitivity, Specificity, and Other Diagnostic Parameters of NGP27b, NGP28b, and NGP30b.

  L. major infections vs heterologous diseases
L. major vs L. tropica infections
  NG27b (%) NGP28b (%) NGP30b (%) NG27b (%) NGP28b (%) NGP30b (%)
Original Valuesa
sensitivityb 95.3 88.0 91.0 95.3 88.0 91.0
specificityc 82.8 80.0 80.0 93.8 88.2 79.0
FPRd 17.2 20.0 20.0 6.2 11.8 21.0
PPVe 94.2 93.1 93.1 98.8 97.6 95.3
NPVf 85.7 68.6 75.0 79.0 57.7 65.2
Post-TG-ROC Analysisg
sensitivity 94.2 83.5 88.0 95.3 88.0 88.0
specificity 85.7 92.3 100.0 100.0 88.2 93.8
FPR 14.3 7.7 0.0 0.0 11.8 6.2
PPV 95.3 92.0 100.0 100.0 96.4 98.8
NPV 82.8 60.0 75.0 75.0 48.4 57.7
a

Values calculated based on the initial cutoff value (Ci ; titer = 1.000) (Figure 2a), as described in the Supporting Information (“Chemiluminescent ELISA”).

b

Sensitivity = true positive (TP)/TP + false negative (FN).

c

Specificity = true negative (TN)/TN + false positive (FP).

d

False-positive rate = 100 – specificity.

e

Positive predictive value = TP/TP + FP.

f

Negative predictive value = TN/TN + FN.

g

Values calculated based on the TG-ROC analysis (Figure 2c; Tables S1 and S2).