Table 2.
Procedure | Statistics (95% CI) | Name of marker | ROMA | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HE4 | CA 125 | ROMA All |
ROMA Pre-Menopause |
ROMA Post-Menopause |
||
Sensitivity | 0.73 (0.71–0.75) | 0.84 (0.82–0.85) | 0.86 (0.84–0.87) | 0.80 (0.78–0.83) | 0.88 (0.86–0.89) | |
Specificity | 0.90 (0.89–0.91) | 0.73 (0.72–0.74) | 0.79 (0.78–0.80) | 0.80 (0.79–0.82) | 0.83 (0.81–0.84) | |
Random effect | LR + ve | 10.61 (7.28–15.45) | 2.91 (2.47–3.42) | 4.66 (3.41–6.35) | 4.59 (3.41–6.18) | 5.86 (4.35–7.89) |
LR –ve | 0.27 (0.21–0.34) | 0.23 (0.19–0.29) | 0.18 (0.13–0.24) | 0.26 (0.21–0.33) | 0.15 (0.12–0.19) | |
Diagnostic Odds ratio | 41.03 (27.96–60.21) | 13.44 (9.97–18.13) | 27.48 (18.70–40.38) | 18.93 (13.04–27.48) | 44.04 (31.27–62.03) | |
Tau-square (%) | 67.71 | 41.90 | 65.74 | 51.61 | 36.19 | |
Cochrane-Q | 107.60 (P = 0.001) | 106.84 (P = 0.001) | 117.96 (P = 0.001) | 67.63 (P = 0.001) | 49.54 (P = 0.002) | |
Spearman’s correlation | 0.49 (P = 0.013) | 0.12 (P = 0.576) | 0.30 (P = 0.183) | 0.18 (P = 0.390) | 0.46 (P = 0.019) | |
Fixed effect | LR + ve | 7.73 (7.05–8.46) | 2.98 (2.84–3.12) | 4.07 (3.84–4.32) | 4.30 (3.97–4.66) | 4.64 (4.19–5.12) |
LR –ve | 0.30 (0.28–0.32) | 0.23 (0.21–0.25) | 0.18 (0.16–0.20) | 0.25 (0.22–0.29) | 0.15 (0.13–0.17) | |
Diagnostic Odds ratio | 37.31 (31.63–44.01) | 13.57 (11.93–15.42) | 26.24 (22.46–30.65) | 19.09 (15.61–23.35) | 42.42 (33.78–53.27) | |
Tau-square | 77.70 | 76.60 | 82.20 | 66.00 | 49.50 | |
Cochrane-Q | 107.60 (P = 0.001) | 106.84 (P = 0.001) | 117.96 (P = 0.001) | 67.63 (P = 0.001) | 49.54 (P = 0.002) | |
Symmetrical ROC (SROC) |
AUC (SE) Q* index (SE) |
0.91 (0.01) 0.84 (0.01) |
0.86 (0.02) 0.79 (0.02) |
0.91 (0.01) 0.84 (0.01) |
0.88 (0.01) 0.81 (0.01) |
0.94 (0.01) 0.87 (0.01) |
Human epididymis secretory protein 4 (HE4), Cancer antigen (CA125) and Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA). Positive Likelihood ratio (LR + ve), Negative Likelihood ratio (LR–ve), Standard error (SE).