Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 27;11:17308. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96552-9

Table 3.

Results of meta regression analysis to assess causes of heterogeneity.

Variable HE4 CA125 ROMA (ALL) ROMA
(pre-menopause)
ROMA
(post-menopause)
Analysis of diagnostic odds ratio (DOR)
Constant (SE) 3.27 (0.24)* 2.64 (0.19)* 3.35 (0.21)* 2.91 (0.20)* 3.85 (0.18)*
Slope (SE) − 0.29 (0.11)* − 0.06 (0.16) − 0.10 (0.17) − 0.17 (0.17) − 0.17 (0.13)
Tau-square 0.50 0.42 0.75 0.57 0.40
Meta regression with cutoff value as covariate#
Tau-square 0.36 0.45 0.84 0.64 0.46
Constant (SE) 1.31 (0.65) 2.76 (0.35)* 2.18 (1.60) 2.49 (0.88)* 3.67 (1.81)
S coefficient (SE) − 0.14 (0.12) − 0.14 (0.16) − 0.03 (0.20) − 0.12 (0.18) − 0.16 (0.14)
Cutoff (SE) 0.02 (0.01)* − 0.002 (0.01) 0.06 (0.08) 0.04 (0.08) 0.007 (0.06)
Meta regression with age as covariate#
Tau-square 0.81 0.51 1.06 Could not be carried out due to non-availability of Age details separately for pre-menopause and post-menopause status
Constant (SE) 2.57 (1.79) 1.60 (1.51) 1.63 (2.18)
S coefficient (SE) − 0.31 (0.16) − 0.24 (0.19) − 0.24 (0.25)
Age (SE) 0.01 (0.03) 0.03 (0.03) 0.03 (0.04)
Meta regression with cutoff value and age as covariates#
Tau-square 0.49 0.78 1.30 Could not be carried out due to non-availability of Age details separately for pre-menopause and post-menopause status
Constant (SE) 1.01 (1.57) 1.62 (2.93) 1.21 (2.65)
S coefficient (SE) − 0.18 (0.15) − 0.30 (0.25) − 0.15 (0.35)
Cutoff (SE) 0.03 (0.01)* 0.02 (0.09) 0.05 (0.12)
Age (SE) − 0.003 (0.03) 0.013 (0.04) 0.02 (0.05)

*Coefficients are statistically significant at P < 0.05, Human epididymis secretory protein 4 (HE4), Cancer antigen (CA125) and Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA). Standard error (SE).

#Meta-regression was weighted by the inverse of the variance of diagnostic Odds Ratio and between study variance was estimated by Random Effect Model (REML).