Table 3.
Composition | Crosslinking of Fibres | Findings | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nanofibrous Honey Scaffold | Honey | Material | Method | Conditions | Wound Healing Properties | Characteristics | References | |
Honey/PVA/
Chitosan |
||||||||
High concentration honey chitosan electrospun nanofibers (HP-chitosan) |
Honey (20–40%) |
chitosan (1.5% to 5.5%), PVA. |
Chemical crosslink Physical crosslink-heating and freeze/thawing |
GA vapors heating (under vacuum in an oven, up to 110°/up to 24 h) and freezing (in liquid nitrogen)/thawing (at room temperature. |
In vitro | HP–chitosan; (30%:7%:3.5%) enhanced antibacterial activity against S. aureus (complete inhibition after 48 h with 30%:7%:5.5 %), poor antibacterial activity against E. coli. |
HP–chitosan (30%:7%:3.5%) upon aging for more than 2 days acquired the optimum viscosity required for easy spinning and formation of uniform nanofiber. Effective biocompatible wound dressing. |
[108] |
Honey /PVA/chitosan nanofibers | Honey (10–30%) | chitosan (3.5%), PVA (7%), acetic acid (1%). | Chemical crosslink Heating |
GA vapors 40 °C |
In vitro | Enhanced antibacterial activity against Gram-positive S. aureus over the Gram-negative E.coli | Increase in fiber diameter; Large pore diameter reaching 140 μm (10, 30% honey); Degradation decreased with crosslinking of the fibre mats. |
[109] |
Honey-PVA-chitosan nanofibers green wound dressing (bio-compatible apitherapeutic nanofibers international patent (2006.01) |
Honey (25–50%) | PVA, chitosan (1.5–11%) bee venom, propolis, garlic (2–30%), bacteriophage | In vitro | Honey-PVA-chitosan nanofibers loaded with bee venom/bacteriophage exhibited potent antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative strains and achieved nearly complete killing of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonase aeruginosa. Enhanced wound healing and improved biocompatibility |
[110,111] | |||
Honey/PVA | ||||||||
Honey, pomegranate peel extract and bee venomnanofibrous wound dressing | Manuka honey (MH) (10–25%), lyophilized multiflora honey powder (25 %) | PVA (up to 12%), bee venom (BV, 0.01%), methanolic pomegranate peel extract (PPP, up to 2.5%). |
Chemical crosslink Heating |
25% GH vapours in a vacuum oven at 40 °C/24 h |
In vivo | MH/PPP/BV/PVA (25%/2.5%/0.01%/9.7%) close resemblance to normal skin at day 10; |
No cytotoxic (100 % viability, tested on L929 fibroblast cells) | [112] |
In vitro | effective inhibition of bacterial growth for S. aureus and E. coli. | |||||||
PVA/honey nanofibers | Iran-Tabriz honey (up to 40%) | PVA, dexamethasone sodium phosphate (anti-inflammatory drug loaded up to 15%) | Only electro-spinning | Decreased diameter of electrospun fibers caused by increasing honey concentration. | [104] | |||
PVA/honey nanofibrous scaffolds (with low honey concentration for internal tissue regeneration) |
Dabur honey (India) (0.2–1% w/v) |
PVA 12% (w/v) | Chemical crosslink | GA vapours (2 M) for 24 h. | In vitro | Drastically reduced biofilm Nanofiber membranes with 0.5% honey loading can be suggested as optimum concentration |
Minimal weight loss of fibers for 10 days. | [113] |
PVA–DES–honey nanofibers | Acacia honey (China) (5%, w/v) |
PVA (8%, w/v), DES (5%, w/v) | Only electro-spinning | In vitro | Possess excellent antimicrobial activity (E. coli, S. aureus) total bacterial reduction of 37.0% and 37.9% against E. coli and S. aureus, respectively, after 6 hour incubation in bacterial cultures; excellent cytocompatibility, non-toxic |
The nanofiber materials dissolved rapidly in artificial saliva solutions, suggesting potential use of materials for fast-dissolving drug delivery in oral cavities | [114] | |
In vivo | PVA–DES–honey nanofibers accelerated the wound healing process, and improved the wound healing rate on rat skin to 85.2% after 6 days of surgery, when compared to the control PVA (68.2%) and PVA–DES (76.3%) nanofibe | |||||||
Honey/PICT | ||||||||
PICT/honey nanofibrous | Pakistan forest honey (10–20%) |
PICT | Good elastic behavior and tensile strength (PICT/honey nanofibers containing 15% honey); good releasing efficiency, complete release of honey in 15 min, the maximum release in 10 min (72 mg/L, 56% of honey). |
[115] | ||||
Honey/silk fibroin | ||||||||
Honey-silk fibroin (SF) electrospun scaffold | Medical grade Manuka honey (Melita) (5% of 5 and 20 UMF) | Lyophilized SF (5%) | In vitro | Tissue engineered scaffold could be incorporated with MH of any UMF, resulting in the same bactericidal outcome | No significant difference in porosity, bacterial clearance and adhesion, glucose release, or proliferation of cells as effected by the incorporation of 5 versus 20 UMF MH. |
[116] | ||
MH/SF composite fibrous matrices manufactured by green electrospinning |
Manuka honey (UMF 5+) 0, 10%, 30%, 50%, 70% |
SF 20% (wt/v) and 2% (wt/v) PEO | In vivo | The addition of MH improved the wound healing rate of the SF fibrous matrices; wound treated with MH (70%)/SF showed a similar healing effect as the AquacelAg dressing. |
Excellent biocompatibility m (incorporation of MH could further improve the affinity of SF fibrous matrices for cells) |
[117] | ||
In vitro | Increase in the bacterial inhibition efficacy with increasing the content of MH. | |||||||
Honey/PCL | ||||||||
Manuka honey-PCL nanofiber scaffolds |
1, 5, 10, and 20% v/v Manuka honey solutions |
15 wt% of PCL (Polycaprolactone) | Honey scaffolds demonstrated significant clearance in only the Gram-negative E. coli | Lower elasticity and strength with honey incorporation, but showed no notable change in material degradation rate with the presence of honey over a 28 day PBS soak. |
[118] |