Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 18;13(8):2840. doi: 10.3390/nu13082840

Table 6.

Results of subgroup–analysis for fullness (mm) and protein–rich breakfast.

Number of
Comparisons
WMD (95% CI) Heterogeneity
I2 (%)
p
between
Subgroup analyses for fullness and protein–rich breakfast (post–breakfast)
Study–design
Crossover 10 6.0 (4.1, 7.9) 76% p < 0.0001
Parallel 3 0.1 (−0.1, 0.3) 0% 0.46
Sex
Girl 3 −0.3 (−6.7, 6.2) 65% 0.06
Boy 2 6.4 (4.3, 8.5) 95% p < 0.0001
Both 7 −0.1 (−0.5, 0.3) 58% 0.03
Economic status of country
High–income country 9 2.5 (−2.2, 7.1) 57% 0.02
Medium–and low– income country 4 0.2 (−0.0, 0.4) 95% p < 0.0001
Baseline body mass index (BMI)
Non–overweight/Overweight 5 5.9 (−1.8, 13.5) 29% 0.23
Overweight/Obese 8 0.2 (−0.0, 0.4) 90% p < 0.0001
Subgroup analyses for fullness and protein–rich breakfast (pre–lunch)
Study–design
Crossover 10 2.4 (0.3, 4.5) 53% 0.02
Parallel 3 10.1 (9. 9, 10.3) 0% 0.52
Sex
Girl 3 −1.8 (−7.9, 4.2) 76% 0.01
Boy 2 3.4 (1.0, 5.8) 37% 0.21
Both 8 10.1 (9.9, 10.3) 59% 0.02
Economic status of country
High–income country 9 −0.8 (−5.1, 3.4) 46% 0.06
Medium–and low– income country 4 10.1 (9.9, 10.3) 90% P < 0.0001
Baseline body mass index (BMI)
Non–overweight/Overweight 5 0.6 (−5.9, 6.9) 33% 0.2
Overweight/Obese 8 10.0 (9.8, 10.2) 88% P < 0.0001