Table 2.
Comparison between recently proposed sensors for edible oil sensing with the proposed SSPP sensor.
Application | Design | Technology | Technology Complexity | Sample Volume | Sensitivity (MHz/) | Operating Frequency | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adulteration detection | Double complementary SRR | PCB | Medium | Immersed | 1133 | 11.56 GHz | [10] |
Characterization of Cooking oils | Metamaterial—SRR | Designed | Medium | Estimated: 0.01 mL |
1120 | 30 GHz | [14] |
Determination of frying time | Transmission line—sensor 1 | PCB | Medium | Immersed | Estimated 243 |
Estimated 5.45 GHz | [15] |
Determination of frying time | Transmission line—sensor 2 | PCB | Medium | Immersed | Estimated 270 |
Estimated 5.45 GHz | [15] |
Identification of edible oils | Meta-surface absorber | PCB | Medium | Estimated <1 mL |
500 | 9.887 GHz | [16] |
Adulteration detection | EBG-inspired Patch resonator | PDMS | High | 0.8 mL | 205.1 | 2.592 GHz | [18] |
Dielectric characterization | Double SRR | PCB | Medium | Immersed | 74.37 | 1.85 GHz | [19] |
Proposed sensor | SSPP | Hybrid | Simple | 0.8 mL | 850 | 6.32 GHz | - |